ASA Adjudication on Peoples Liverpool Ltd

Peoples Liverpool Ltd t/a Peoples Ford

Callendar Road
Falkirk
FK1 1SQ

Date:

14 November 2007

Media:

Regional press

Sector:

Motoring

Number of complaints:

1

Agency:

CuriousGroup Ltd

Complaint Ref:

22868

Ad

A press ad for Peoples Ford was headed “200 REASONS TO BE HAPPY!” Body copy stated “200 high quality, low mileage used cars with fantastic savings and great benefits including: access to specialist Ford sales staff and Ford technicians; comprehensive pre-sale checks; independent RAC checks and much more. Come in this weekend - you’ll be smiles better off!” The ad showed several different Ford models and listed their features, sale prices and the branch locations Bridge Road, Prescot, Orrell Lane, Bootle and Speke Hall Road, Speke. One of the models was a 2006 Ford Focus LX, 5-door priced at £7,695.

Issue

A reader challenged the availability of the Ford Focus model.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Peoples Ford provided stock records and copies of invoices which they believed showed they had Ford Focus models of the same specification as the one seen by the reader in stock when the ad was published, and that they had continued to purchase, hold in stock and sell further models of the same specification after that. They said they could not explain why the customer was told no model was available, but believed it may have been the case that a trainee salesperson had failed to follow their company procedures on this occasion.

Assessment

Not upheld

The ASA noted that the stock records and invoices Peoples Ford provided showed that Ford Focus models of the specification advertised had been sold to customers at the price stated. Because the ad had run once a week for a month, some of those transactions had taken place before the ad the complainant had seen and responded to was published. Nevertheless, the records showed that when the ad the complainant saw appeared, there was a Ford Focus model of the specification and price advertised available for sale. We considered Peoples Ford had provided sufficient evidence to support the claim.

We investigated the ad under CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness) and 16.1 (Availability) but did not find it in breach.

Action

No action necessary.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA