ASA Adjudication on Stephen Norton

Stephen Norton t/a Racing Advisory Service

Stephen Norton Helipad 122
80 High Street
Winchester
SO23 9AT

Date:

11 April 2007

Media:

Brochure

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

17475

Ad

A brochure for Stephen Norton, a betting tipster, stated on the cover "ADVERTISED BY THE RACING POST COME RACING ‘It's not what you know in racing, it's who you know’ STEPHEN NORTON Racing Advisory Service Est. 1986". The following page showed a photograph of two men, one of whom was wearing a pilot’s uniform. Text stated " ... Stephen has been involved in racing for 20 years, has a fantastic knowledge of the sport with powerful people behind him ... I decided to start up my own helicopter-charter company … On a regular basis I have been transporting the world’s elite owners, trainers, jockeys and other people very important to the horse racing world … Having many friends who are some of the most powerful people in the racing world is also highly valuable ... there are only a handful of people in the country who know when to place their bets at the right time - known as professional punters. J.P. McManus is very well known for this … With this information and powerful friends behind me this is why my results are untouchable ...". The last page of the brochure showed a photograph of three men and a woman on a field, walking away from a helicopter. Text below the photograph said "Another successful days racing for myself and my crew. Receiving information from such powerful and influential people brings knowledge, inside information and the most important reason for everything behind racing - money & power ...".

Issue

Anne-Marie and Aidan O'Brien, who appeared in the photographs, and JP McManus challenged whether:

1. the brochure was misleading, because it implied that Stephen Norton obtained inside information from Mr and Mrs O'Brien and Mr McManus, which they claimed was not true and

2. Stephen Norton had permission to use the photographs of Mr and Mrs OBrien.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Stephen Norton did not respond to the ASA's enquiries.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA was concerned by Stephen Norton's lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code clause 2.6 (Non-response). We reminded him of his obligations under the Code and told him to respond promptly in future.

We were concerned that Stephen Norton had not substantiated the brochures implication that he received inside information from Mr and Mrs O'Brien and Mr McManus. We were also concerned that he had not submitted evidence to show that he had permission to publish photographs of Mr and Mrs O'Brien.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 2.6 (Non-response), 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness) and 13.1 (Protection of privacy).

Action

We told Stephen Norton to withdraw the brochure and asked CAP to inform its media members of the problem with Stephen Norton.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA