ASA Adjudication on Paul McKenna Productions

Paul McKenna Productions t/a Paul McKenna Training

Newcombe House
45 Notting Hill Gate
London
W11 3LQ

Date:

26 September 2007

Media:

Regional press

Sector:

Health and beauty

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

29942

Ad

A regional press ad, for a weight loss event, showed a picture of the hypnotist Paul McKenna and stated “ … the most effective weight loss system available. Lose weight and keep it off … ”.

Issue

The complainant challenged the claim "the most effective weight loss system available. Lose weight and keep it off".

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Paul McKenna Training (PKT) explained that traditional diets generally had a success rate of around 12%.  They said they had commissioned two independent, controlled surveys on previous attendees to weight loss events: they supplied the surveys which showed that 71% of participants had lost weight; they said the surveys were conducted three and six months after the event.  They said they believed the system was the most effective available, but they accepted that they could not yet supply independent research comparing the system to other methods.  They said they would not repeat this statement until they had independent research to substantiate it.  They asserted that the surveys provided showed that participants had lost weight and had kept it off.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA welcomed PKT's decision not to repeat the claim "the most effective weight loss system available" until they had independent and robust research to support it.  We considered that most readers would understand the claim "Lose weight and keep it off" to mean that, by following the system, participants would lose weight and keep it off for the rest of their life.  We also considered that the ad implied weight loss and subsequent weight maintenance were guaranteed. Although we noted a high proportion of participants reported that they had lost weight using the system after three and six months, we nevertheless concluded that the substantiation was inadequate to support the implication that all participants would lose weight and keep it off for ever.  

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 and 3.2 (Substantiation), 19.1 (Other comparisons) and 51.1 (Health & beauty products and therapies - General).

Action

We told PKT not to repeat the claim and advised them to seek help from the CAP Copy Advice team on future weight loss claims.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA