ASA Adjudication on Blackspot Interactive Ltd
Blackspot Interactive Ltd t/a
Road Angel Group Ltd
Road Angel Group Ltd
Clark House
Silverstone Technology Park
Silverstone Circuit
Northants
NN12 8GX
Date:
1 April 2009
Media:
Magazine
Sector:
Motoring
Number of complaints:
1
Complaint Ref:
82474
Ad
A magazine ad, for a speed detector, showed a traffic-free road outside a school. Text stated "Are you missing something?" The same picture appeared two pages further on in the magazine, but this time a young girl was running across the road. Text stated "50% less accidents with ROAD ANGEL". Below, it stated "ROAD ANGEL Professional Connected is the UK's most advanced safety camera locator, alerting you to fixed and mobile cameras, school zones and other road hazards ... A six month survey of a 100 vehicle fleet* showed that users of ROAD ANGEL products are 50% less likely to be involved in traffic accidents - a vital reduction, especially around school zones ...". The asterisk linked to small print that stated "Survey conducted by Sanofi Synthelabo, visit www.roadangelgroup.com/press for more details".
Issue
A reader challenged whether:
1. the claim "50% less accidents with ROAD ANGEL" was misleading and could be substantiated, and
2. the ad misleadingly implied the survey included data taken from school zones.
CAP Code (Edition 11)
Response
1. & 2. Road Angel Group (Road Angel) believed they held evidence for the claims but acknowledged that, when the ASA investigated similar claims made in one of their previous ads in 2005, the ASA had considered that the survey was not sufficiently robust to substantiate the claims. They said, due to senior management changes over recent years, they had been unaware of the 2005 ASA Adjudication. Road Angel said they would amend the ad and would no longer use statistics drawn from the survey in their advertising.
Assessment
1. & 2. Upheld
The ASA was concerned that Road Angel based the claims on a survey that the ASA had already considered to be flawed and therefore insufficiently robust to substantiate such claims. We welcomed their assurance that they would amend the ad and would no longer use statistics drawn from the survey in their advertising.
The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 and 7.2 (Truthfulness) and 48.8 (Motoring safety claims).
Action
The ad must not appear again in its current form. We advised Road Angel to consult the CAP Copy Advice team before advertising again.
Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)
Making a complaint
Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.
How to complain
Adjudications
View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.
Adjudications
Sign up
Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.
Sign up
Already registered? Log in
Follow Us
For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs
We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.
Dealing with complaints - FAQs