Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Toyota (GB) plc

Toyota (GB) plc

Great Burgh
Burgh Heath
Epsom
Surrey
KT18 5UX

Date:

13 May 2009

Media:

Regional press

Sector:

Motoring

Number of complaints:

1

Agency:

Glue London

Complaint Ref:

82265

Ad

A regional press ad, for the Toyota IQ, stated “I_CAN_CARRY_4_OF_YOU I_CAN_PROTECT_YOU I_CAN_GO­_ANYWHERE I_AM_UNIQUE I_AM_IQ”.

Issue

The complainant, who was particularly concerned about the safety of passengers in the rear seats, challenged whether Toyota could substantiate the claim "I_CAN_PROTECT_YOU".

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Toyota (GB) Ltd (Toyota) said the iQ included a comprehensive array of safety features. They pointed to the nine airbags fitted as standard and highlighted that the model included a world first rear curtain airbag that protected those in the back seats of the car. The other safety features included the anti-lock brake system with electronic brake force distribution, brake assistance, traction control, vehicle stability control (VSC+), whiplash injury lessening, ISOFIX seat fixing and a multiple load path body structure. Toyota pointed out that the iQ model had recently achieved a 5-star rating for safety in the new European New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) safety testing. They pointed out that the new test was more stringent than the previous one as it included a test for Whiplash neck injury protection in rear impact. They added that, in a press release about the new tests, Euro NCAP said "Toyota with the Avensis and iQ demonstrated that car size does not stand in the way of all-round safety".

Assessment

Not upheld

The ASA noted the Toyota iQ had received a 5-Star rating for safety from the Euro NCAP program. We considered that the claim was likely to lead readers to expect that the car had achieved accepted industry safety standards. Because Toyota had shown that the Toyota iQ had, we concluded that the ad was unlikely to mislead.

We investigated the ad under CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness) and 48.8 (Motoring) but did not find it in breach.

Action

No further action necessary.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA