Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Blakefield LLP

Blakefield LLP t/a Windsor Products

Hamilton House
2 Station Road
Epping
Essex
CM16 4HA

Date:

15 July 2009

Media:

National press

Sector:

Retail

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

91306

Ad

A national press ad, for a telescope from Windsor Products, was headlined "High Powered Telescope SAVE £120" and stated "Order yours today and save £120.00 on the normal price - WAS £199.95 - NOW £79.95 ...".

Issue

One complainant challenged whether the claimed "normal price" of "£199.95" was genuine and whether the claim "SAVE £120" could be substantiated.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Windsor Products said they used to sell the telescope for £199.95 and submitted a leaflet and order form, which included photographs of the same product and stated that the price was £199.95.  They also submitted a spreadsheet showing the addresses of customers who had ordered the product at that price.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA considered that readers would expect from the ad that the telescope was generally sold at £199.95 and that the price had applied for a reasonable period of time before the ad appeared.  However, we found several national press ads placed by Windsor Products, showing that they had been offering the product at £79.95 for almost six months before the ad seen by the complainant appeared.  Windsor Products did not confirm the most recent date when they sold the telescope at £199.95 or the period of time for which they had applied that price to the product, although the leaflet they submitted, which featured the £199.95 price, stated " ... Windsor Products 2006 ...", which we considered indicated that the product had not been sold at that price for over two years before the ad appeared.  In addition, Windsor Products did not provide evidence that any other retailer sold the product for £199.95.  We concluded that Windsor Products had not substantiated that the claimed "normal price" of "£199.95" was genuine or that readers could "SAVE £120", and the ad was therefore likely to mislead.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 and 7.2 (Truthfulness) and 15.5 (Prices).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA