Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Home Shopping Selections Ltd

Home Shopping Selections Ltd

Euro House
Cremers Road
Sittingbourne
Kent
ME10 3US

Date:

5 August 2009

Media:

National press

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

93295

Ad

A national press ad for straps claimed that the product would alleviate joint pain. Text stated "Amazing relief from joint pain … NOW! DEVELOPED IN THE USA, RESEARCH SHOWS THAT THESE SUPPORTS PROVIDE QUICK AND FAST RELIEF.” A quote from “MRS J.E. MOORA, WA” stated “I felt relief almost immediately … I find the Knee Strap excellent!” Text continued “This unbelievably effective range of Joint Straps were [sic] developed to give relief from joint pain. The Knee Strap, for example, works immediately to reduce swelling, relieve pain and aid mobility … See our range of joint pain featured here - if you have a problem with joint pain there is sure to be one to help you. Don't tolerate joint pain a second longer - order your Joint Strap TODAY." Images of the products on various joints were featured and text stated “Thousands are already using these straps! Read what satisfied customers say ...” There were testimonial quotes, such as “'I write to say the results were amazing - absolutely - and I was sceptical!”- MR D.P. WOOLGOOLA, NSW,” and “'A friend of mine was given the knee strap and has done nothing but sing its praises of the relief it has given her'” - MRS L.H. - MARYBOROUGH, VIC.” The order details were given.

Issue

1. The complainant challenged whether the claims about pain relief could be substantiated.

2. The ASA challenged whether the testimonials were genuine and whether they gave a misleading impression of the effects of the products.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

1. & 2. Home Shopping Selections (HSS) stated they had suspended future ads, but did not provide a formal response to our enquiries.

Assessment

1. & 2. Upheld

The ASA noted that HSS had not provided any documentary evidence to support the ads claims about pain relief, or any evidence that the testimonials were genuine.  Because of that, we considered that their claims had not been substantiated and concluded that the ad was misleading.

Investigated under CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness), 14.1, 14.3 (Testimonials and endorsements) and 50.1 (Health & beauty products and therapies).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form.  We advised the advertisers to seek guidance from the CAP Copy Advice team before advertising again.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA