Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on British Sky Broadcasting Ltd

British Sky Broadcasting Ltd t/a Sky

NHC3, Ground Floor
Legal Marketing
Grant Way
Isleworth
Middlesex
TW7 5QD

Pfizer Ltd

Walton Oaks
Dorking Road
Walton-on-the-Hill
Surrey
KT20 7NS

Date:

27 January 2010

Media:

Television

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

2

Complaint Ref:

110512

Ad

A TV ad for Pfizer, warning against the purchase of counterfeit medicines, featured an image of a man regurgitating a rat.

Issue

The complainant objected that the ad was inappropriately broadcast at 10.45pm.

BCAP TV Code

BCAP TV Scheduling Code

Response

Sky explained that the ad was scheduled to appear during a live National Football League match after 11pm. However, they said the format of the live sport coverage changed and the ad break was shown approximately 15 minutes before the timing restriction. Sky said that, because they were not the host broadcaster, they were forced to make quick changes to accommodate the changing format which meant they were unable to amend the ad break to remove the ad. They apologised for the ad appearing before 11pm and for any distress it may have caused viewers.

Pfizer explained that they sought to ensure the ad was targeted appropriately to avoid potential fear and distress to younger audiences. They said they followed general industry practice in notifying broadcasters that the ad had a strict post 11pm timing restriction and only booked the ad to appear after that time.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA understood that the ad was transmitted before 11pm in error due to a change in the timing of live sports coverage. We understood that this was a one-off instance outside of Skys control, but nonetheless considered that they had a responsibility as the broadcaster to ensure ads were shown at appropriate times. Because the ad appeared before its assigned timing restriction during sports coverage that was likely to have wide-ranging appeal, we concluded that the broadcast had breached the Code.

The ad breached CAP (Broadcast) TV Code rule 7.4.7 (Use of scheduling restrictions) and CAP (Broadcast) Scheduling Code rule 4.2.1 (Children and young people.)

Action

We told Sky to ensure that ads were broadcast appropriately in future.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA