Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Green Bullion Financial Services LLC

Green Bullion Financial Services LLC t/a Cash 4 Gold

2800 Gateway Drive
Pompano Beach
FL 33069
USA

Date:

6 January 2010

Media:

Television

Sector:

Financial

Number of complaints:

3

Agency:

EURO RSGC

Complaint Ref:

104944

Ad

A TV ad, for Cash 4 Gold, included a voice-over that stated “I sent in my diamond wedding band from my first marriage and got more money back then I could ever have imagined … With gold, silver and platinum at their highest value in decades cash4gold.com is able to give you a great deal for your unwanted jewellery and because we own our refinery there’s no middleman which means more money in your pocket …”. On-screen text stated “Get a GREAT PRICE For Your GOLD … The Industry Leader … More Money in Your Pocket”.

Issue

Three complainants, who believed that Cash 4 Golds rates were well below market value, challenged whether the ad was misleading, because it implied that the best price would be offered when gold was exchanged.

BCAP TV Code

Response

Cash 4 Gold said the claims in the ad were subjective comparisons and did not state or imply that they would offer the best prices or market rates.  They said the price of gold fluctuated constantly and this, therefore made any fixed comparison in their ads difficult to support.  Furthermore, they pointed out that the quality of the gold they received, specifically, the gold content of jewellery, varied considerably.  Cash 4 Gold added that, if a customer was dissatisfied with the price they received, they could send back the cheque and have their items returned.

Clearcast endorsed Cash 4 Golds response.

Assessment

Not upheld

The ASA noted the several price related claims in the ad and, in particular, the claims that Cash 4 Gold offered a "great deal" and a "great price" for gold.  Although we noted the complainants concern that they implied that Cash 4 Gold would give customers the best price for their gold, we considered that viewers were unlikely to infer that that was the case.  We considered that they were likely to understand that the claims were subjective and represented Cash 4 Golds opinion of the price and service they offered. Furthermore, we considered that viewers were unlikely to expect from the ad that Cash 4 Gold would offer them the best market rates for receiving and processing their old jewellery. Consequently, we concluded that the ad was unlikely to mislead.

We investigated the ad under CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code rule 5.1.1 (Misleading advertising) but did not find it in breach.

Action

No further action necessary.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA