ASA Adjudication on SpicerHaart Group Ltd
SpicerHaart Group Ltd t/a
Haart Estate Agents
Wellington House
Butt Road
Colchester
Essex
CO3 3DA
Date:
5 May 2010
Media:
Regional press
Sector:
Property
Number of complaints:
1
Complaint Ref:
118541
Ad
A regional press ad for an estate agent depicted a pink heart with the words "Good Bye" written on it. Headline text stated "BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO". The word "HARD" had been crossed out and replaced with the word "easy". Text continued "Switch to haart without penalty”. Smaller text stated “If your current estate agent isn’t delivering, and you decide to leave them then ‘Switch’ to haart. We’ll smooth the way by settling any leaving fees or HIPs charges you might be liable for, up to £1000, until we sell your home, you withdraw your property from sale or for 9 months”.
Issue
A reader objected that the ad was misleading because it stated that the payments would only be deferred rather than absorbed by the advertisers, which they believed contradicted the claim about switching "without penalty".
CAP Code (Edition 11)
Response
Spicer Haart said the intention of the ad was to highlight the practice whereby certain agents included hidden lock-in fees to prevent customers switching agents. They said the ad sought to explain that they assisted the customer to avoid the penalty of being locked-in to their current agent. They said the text at the foot of the ad clearly explained that Spicer Haart settled such lock-in fees until payment at a later date by the customer and they did not consider the ad to be misleading on that basis.
Assessment
Upheld
We noted the headline claim stated "Switch to haart without penalty". Although we acknowledged the smaller print stating "Well smooth the way by settling any leaving fees or HIPs charges you might be liable for, up to £1000, until we sell your home, you withdraw your property from sale or for 9 months", we considered that, because readers would still be liable for leaving fees, which Spicer Haart was offering to pay temporarily in order to enable people to switch estate agents, but not permanently, the headline claim was contradicted by the qualifying text. We concluded that the ad was likely to mislead.
The ad breached CAP Code clause 7.1 (Truthfulness).
Action
The ad must not appear again in its current form.
Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)
Making a complaint
Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.
How to complain
Adjudications
View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.
Adjudications
Sign up
Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.
Sign up
Already registered? Log in
Follow Us
For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs
We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.
Dealing with complaints - FAQs