Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on SpicerHaart Group Ltd

SpicerHaart Group Ltd t/a Haart Estate Agents

Wellington House
Butt Road
Colchester
Essex
CO3 3DA

Date:

5 May 2010

Media:

Regional press

Sector:

Property

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

118541

Ad

A regional press ad for an estate agent depicted a pink heart with the words "Good Bye" written on it. Headline text stated "BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO". The word "HARD" had been crossed out and replaced with the word "easy". Text continued "Switch to haart without penalty”. Smaller text stated “If your current estate agent isn’t delivering, and you decide to leave them then ‘Switch’ to haart. We’ll smooth the way by settling any leaving fees or HIPs charges you might be liable for, up to £1000, until we sell your home, you withdraw your property from sale or for 9 months”.

Issue

A reader objected that the ad was misleading because it stated that the payments would only be deferred rather than absorbed by the advertisers, which they believed contradicted the claim about switching "without penalty".

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Spicer Haart said the intention of the ad was to highlight the practice whereby certain agents included hidden lock-in fees to prevent customers switching agents. They said the ad sought to explain that they assisted the customer to avoid the penalty of being locked-in to their current agent. They said the text at the foot of the ad clearly explained that Spicer Haart settled such lock-in fees until payment at a later date by the customer and they did not consider the ad to be misleading on that basis.

Assessment

Upheld

We noted the headline claim stated "Switch to haart without penalty". Although we acknowledged the smaller print stating "Well smooth the way by settling any leaving fees or HIPs charges you might be liable for, up to £1000, until we sell your home, you withdraw your property from sale or for 9 months", we considered that, because readers would still be liable for leaving fees, which Spicer Haart was offering to pay temporarily in order to enable people to switch estate agents, but not permanently, the headline claim was contradicted by the qualifying text. We concluded that the ad was likely to mislead.

The ad breached CAP Code clause 7.1 (Truthfulness).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA