Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Character Options Ltd

Character Options Ltd

Lees Brook Mill
Lees Road
Oldham
OL4 5JL.

Date:

16 June 2010

Media:

Television

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

120308

Ad

A TV ad, for a toy ice-cream parlour, showed children eating from full cups of ice cream and using the product to make the ice cream. They assembled the toy, added the ingredients, and ice cream was shown pouring into a cup as one of the children turned the handle.

Issue

The complainant challenged whether the product worked as advertised, because he had bought it and did not achieve the results shown.

BCAP TV Code

Response

Character Options said they had advertised the product on TV regularly over the past 12 months. During that time, and the 18 months in which they had sold the product through a number of major retailers, they had not had any major quality issues or complaints that the ice-cream parlour did not function as suggested. They said if the user followed the instructions included with the product they could make up to three cups of ice-cream; additional ice-cream could be made using an additional ingredients mix. They said their own research had shown the product was very much enjoyed by consumers and they believed major retailers would not stock the ice-cream parlour if it did not adhere to acceptable customer requirements. Character Options submitted a video that showed the product in use.

Clearcast said they spent considerable time testing toys to ensure ads did not exaggerate their attributes; they had tested the ice-cream parlour and were satisfied that it worked.

Assessment

Not upheld

The ASA tested the product following the instructions in the box. We were concerned that the complainant had been unable to achieve the results shown in the ad but considered the product produced ice cream and did so in sufficient quantities to pour into the cup as the handle was turned. We concluded that the ad was not misleading.

We investigated the ad under CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code rules 5.1.1 (Misleading advertising), 5.2.1 (Evidence) and 5.2.2 (Implications) but did not find it in breach.

Action

No further action necessary.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA