Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Playboy TV UK Ltd

Playboy TV UK Ltd

Aquis House
27-37 Station Road
Hayes
Middlesex
UB3 4DX

Date:

14 July 2010

Media:

Magazine

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

2

Complaint Ref:

121345

Ad

A two-page ad in Sport magazine for an adult TV subscription channel was titled "WHERE ARE ALL THE MEN? STAYING IN JUST GOT FUN" and showed an image of a woman in her underwear standing in an empty pole dancing club. The ad included the text "THE 6 CHANNEL LINE UP The world’s most beautiful women come to your screen and bring you the best in quality erotic entertainment Watch the hardest British sex featuring the UK's filthiest talent Three channels of themed programming showing wall to wall non-stop sex Watch the best Top Shelf girls being absolutely filthy every night of the week".

Issue

1. Two complainants objected that the ad was offensive, sexist and degrading towards women.

2. One of the complainants also objected that the ad was irresponsible because they believed it was inappropriate for publication in a free magazine where it could easily be seen by children.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Playboy TV UK Ltd (Playboy TV) did not respond to the ASA's enquiries.

1. Sport magazine said they took the view that Playboy TV was an offshoot of an established and credible male media brand that was universally accepted. They said, whilst the ad promoted a niche service, they believed the description and the imagery was within the realms of taste and decency, albeit of an adult nature.

2. Sport magazine said the magazine was targeted at 20 to 44-year-old adult males and provided a breakdown of audience demographics from 2008 and 2009. They said all hand distribution was aimed at their target audience via merchandisers, who were briefed to distribute to professional 20 to 44-year-old males. They also said the magazine was available for pick up by consumers at places including gyms, corporate locations and airport lounges where they would reach the same target audience.

Assessment

The ASA was concerned by Playboy TV's lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code clause 2.6 (Non-response). We reminded them of their obligations under the Code and told them to respond promptly in the future.

1. Not upheld

We understood that, although the free magazine was potentially available to a large variety of consumers, it was targeted at men who were interested in sport and efforts had been made to distribute in accordance with that demographic. We understood the phrases "filthiest talent" and "Top Shelf girls being absolutely filthy every night of the week" to be enticements to readers to trial the adult subscription service and considered that the ad itself was not commenting on women in general or inviting readers to view all women in that way and was unlikely to be seen by most readers as sexist and degrading. Although we understood that some people might have found the ad and the product which it promoted to be distasteful, we considered that it did not contain explicit imagery or text that was likely to cause serious or widespread offence to readers of Sport.

We concluded that the ad was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence to readers of Sport magazine and was unlikely to be seen as sexist and degrading

On this point, we investigated the ad under CAP Code clauses 5.1 and 5.2 (Decency) but did not find it in breach.

2. Not upheld

We noted, although young boys may have been interested in the content of Sport, the magazine was targeted at adult males and the manner of distribution meant that it was unlikely that children would be directly handed a copy or would be able to pick it up from the other locations in which it was available. We concluded that, because children were unlikely to see the ad, it was acceptable for publication in Sport magazine.

On this point, we investigated the ad under CAP Code clause 2.2 (Responsible advertising) but did not find it in breach.

The ASA was nevertheless concerned that Playboy TV had not responded to its enquiries and considered that to be in breach of clause 2.6 of the CAP Code.

Action

We told Playboy TV to respond promptly to ASA queries in the future

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA