Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on The Airline Seat Company Ltd

The Airline Seat Company Ltd t/a Canadian Affair

4/2 91 Mitchell Street
Glasgow
G1 3LN

Date:

21 July 2010

Media:

Regional press

Sector:

Holidays and travel

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

125838

Ad

A local press ad, for flights to Canada, included flights to Calgary and stated “fr £298 rtn inc taxes”. Small print stated "Flights based on Glasgow departures”.

Issue

A reader objected that ad was misleading, because when he rang to book a Calgary flight from Glasgow he was told that the £298 price only applied to Gatwick and Manchester departures.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

The Airline Seat Company Ltd said they did not have the system back-up to be able to demonstrate that 10% of their flights from Glasgow to Calgary were available at the advertised price at the time the ad appeared. They said they did not have a system which stored the number of seats available on each date. They said their prices fluctuated day by day. Although their lead prices were fixed at price point, the dates on which they might be available would change according to how seats were selling on each date of flight operation. They said, what started out as the lead-in price dates might, by the end of the weekend or after a few days, only be available on another set of dates.

They said they had no intention of misleading customers and were very careful to ensure they offered their lead-in prices when and where they stated.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA considered that marketing communications including a "from" fare should have a minimum of 10% of reservable seats available at that fare. We considered that it was an advertiser's responsibility to collect data in order demonstrate that 10% availability, if advertising "from" prices. Because The Airline Seat Company had not provided evidence to show at least 10% of their Glasgow to Calgary flights were available at the advertised "from" price at the time the complainant saw the ad, we concluded the claim was likely to mislead.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 and 7.2 (Misleading advertising) and 15.1 (Prices).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form. We told The Airline Seat Company to ensure they could demonstrate at least 10% of flights were available at an advertised "from" price.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA