Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Independent News & Media Ltd

Independent News & Media Ltd t/a i

Independent House
191 Marsh Wall
London
E14 9RS

Date:

1 June 2011

Media:

Television

Sector:

Publishing

Number of complaints:

1

Agency:

Mccann Erickson Communications House Ltd

Complaint Ref:

150831

Ad

A TV ad, for a newspaper, stated “i squeezes the content of a quality paper into one that's small and beautifully informed. So I've got the knowledge, in one quick fix. No celeb gossip nonsense, just intelligent stuff and that's why I love i.

Issue

The complainant, who understood the daily Caught and Social column was dedicated to celebrity stories, challenged whether the claim "No celeb gossip nonsense" was misleading.

BCAP Code

Response

Independent News & Media Ltd (Independent) said the daily Caught and Social column was a cultural page that informed readers about worldwide Arts events that featured famous people who attended them. They said their celebrity stories differed from celebrity gossip because, unlike other newspapers, they were based on factual content and not hearsay.

Clearcast said i concentrated on newsworthy stories without sidetracking readers to the kind of celebrity gossip published in red top newspapers and celebrity magazines. They believed the ad made this clear and that the complainant had misunderstood the claim to mean that there would be no mention of celebrities at all. They said this was unrealistic because celebrities featured in a range of newsworthy stories that i reported on that were of significant interest.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted the Caught and Social column featured stories about celebrities and included sections entitled Scene & Heard, OMG, iquote and ichat that quoted celebrities and provided updates about where they had been and what they were doing. We considered that readers would understand from the ad that there was no celebrity gossip in i. However, we noted featured stories in two different publications from March included headings that stated "Alex fancies a pop at 007", "Cilla moves with the times" and "Dame Helen and Russell snog for fans". We considered that readers would interpret these stories as celebrity gossip and therefore concluded that the ad was misleading.

The ad breached BCAP code rule 3.1 (Misleading advertising).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form. We told the Independent not to use the claim "No celeb gossip nonsense" in future.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA