Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Cheapflights Media Ltd

Cheapflights Media Ltd t/a www.cheapflights.co.uk

Control Tower
One Alfred Place
London
WC1E 7EB

Date:

4 January 2012

Media:

Internet (e-tailing)

Sector:

Holidays and travel

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A11-172369

Ad

Claims on the Cheapflights website, viewed on 21 and 22 September 2011, related to the price of flights from London to Colombia. Return prices of £474, £488, £625 and £628 were given, each below text that stated "Prices from". Details of the departure airport, destination and relevant departure dates appeared below each price, along with the text "Price subject to availability". Text above the listed ads stated "Prices updated DAILY and are subject to availability. Check with the advertiser at the time of booking".

Issue

The complainant challenged whether the ads were misleading, because he had been informed that the flights were not available at the advertised prices.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

Cheapflights.co.uk (Cheapflights) said consumers would not deal directly with them when booking flights. They were not a travel agency but an online media company and advertising platform that searched over eleven million flight deals per day and published about one million of the best deals sent to them by airlines, budget airlines, online travel agents and smaller specialist high street agents. They said all advertisers on their site had to be suitably bonded and dealt directly with consumers, either online, via the advertiser's own website, or by phone. Cheapflights said most advertised flights had departure date restrictions and it was therefore possible the complainant had misunderstood the date restrictions stated for each flight. They said the website also clearly stated that the flights were subject to availability. They said they had been unable to identify the travel company that advertised the price of £625 however they contacted the other advertisers and forwarded any response they had received to the ASA. Cheapflights said they took the accuracy of their fares very seriously and therefore had a feedback mechanism on the website. They said they followed up any consumer concerns to ensure stated prices were correct or that any mistakes were removed, because advertisers were responsible for posting valid fares. The advertisers received warnings in relation to any such errors and Cheapflights operated a 'three strikes' policy for advertisers that continued to cause justified complaints.

They said they offered promotions that related to specific dates and those that were 'deals' and each had a different presentation. In the 'deals' category the agency offering the fare would include text such as "depart between 1 November and 31 December", which meant that the advertised price was being offered during that period but that it was, as always, subject to availability and likely to require flexibility in relation to travel dates. Text above such ads, including the ads that were the subject of the complaint, stated "Prices updated DAILY and are subject to availability. Check with the advertiser at the time of booking". In addition that text included a hyperlink, under which text stated "Although we wish we could, nobody in the travel industry can guarantee their advertised price until booking because of the unique dynamic way flight prices are created. Flight prices can be changed by airlines and agents at any time based on bookings, seat availability and popularity of route meaning until you book, the price could change ... We update our prices regularly throughout the day, and show the last time we checked it on each individual flight deal, but by the time you view them, the price could change ...". Ads that related to specific dates only also carried the text "Availability last checked x hours ago". The ads did not have that additional text, because 'deal' prices might continue to be available on some dates in the relevant time period even if they had been sold for popular travel days. Cheapflights said that for deals where they had not checked availability, consumers could see when the deal was last updated by clicking on an 'i' symbol shown next to each deal.

Travel Up Ltd t/a Bargain Flight Desk, who advertised the price of £628, said it was not possible to guarantee the availability of any number of seats on a particular flight and date, due to the fact thousands of agents and millions of consumers were free to hold or book the flights at any time. They said the advertised price was a special offer and could be booked, subject to availability on any particular date. They had, however, checked the advertised date range and found that seats were available to book on certain dates for £628.17. They said it clearly stated on the same page that the flight price was displayed "The data displayed is NOT a display of AVAILABLE flights but is a database of prices and should be used as a means of researching the best fares for a given journey on a date or range of dates. Availability on these special fares is limited and when they're gone, they're gone! Once a suitable fare has been found, challenge our expertise to find seats on the date you wish to travel. All airlines sell only a limited number of seats at the lowest fare on each flight. When these have been sold, you may be offered a seat at a higher fare. However, the price will NOT be removed from the fares database as the cheaper seats may still be available on other dates or subsequently become available again due to the airlines releasing more seats at the lowest fares due to fluctuations of supply and demand".

Polani Travel Ltd t/a ComeFli, the company that advertised the price of £488, said the prices offered to consumers were based on the costs given to them by suppliers; airline prices could change on an ongoing basis and the prices advertised on their websites could change at any time, because they were always subject to availability. They said they made every effort to provide the best fares to passengers however there were times when travel websites such as theirs would not be updated in real time. Their site required manual updating as and when the fares were updated, based on the availability of fares and seats with their local supplier. ComeFli said it was not practically possible to update the website within a short span of time and at regular intervals and therefore they clearly indicated that prices were subject to availability. The terms and conditions area of their website also clearly stated their limited liability to offer the flight arrangements to the passengers, in line with the prices and availability given to them by their suppliers.

They said they regretted that the complainant had contacted them about the advertised price and that the agent had had no option but to explain that he was unable to honour that price, because it was no longer valid. They said there were many visitors to their website, and to their partner websites, and it was therefore not possible to trace when the complainant had visited the site. They said, however, their records indicated that the advertised price was available for quite some time, although they did not have any records of any bookings being made using the advertised fare. They said several consumers could have navigated through several special fares they offered but they had no records of any of them reporting any discrepancy regarding the advertised price from the UK to Colombia. ComeFli said they were looking into alternative ways to rectify any such issues in future.

Sea Breeze Holidays t/a FlightHouseUK.com, the company that advertised the price of £474, said it was their recollection that the flights were available on some of the advertised dates and if a consumer wanted a particular price, they would have been advised of the dates on which seats at that price were available. They said the advertised price was the lowest available in the specified timeframe and the ad made that clear, because it stated "Prices from".

FlightHouseUK.com said it was not possible to guarantee that availability of the advertised fare on any particular date, because the number of seats available at that price was limited. They said thousands of agents were able to make bookings for those fares and therefore it was virtually impossible to guarantee the availability of any particular advertised fare until it had been reserved by a passenger.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted the website stated "Prices subject to availability" under each advertised flight price. We also noted that each price appeared under text that stated "Prices from" and that text above the listed ad stated "Prices updated DAILY and are subject to availability. Check with the advertiser at the time of booking". We considered that made clear that not all seats on the advertised routes would be available at the fares stated. We also noted, however, the complainant said he had informed the travel companies he was available to travel on any date in order to achieve the advertised fare but had been informed that the stated prices were not available.

We understood from the advertisers' responses that availability fluctuated and that there would therefore be times when customers were not able to obtain seats at the advertised prices. We noted Bargain Flight Desk said text that explained the limited nature of their prices appeared on the same page as the price itself and that ComeFli said their limited liability to offer those prices was explained in the terms and conditions area of their website. We noted, however, that information was on the companies' own websites, rather than being made clear in the ads that appeared on the Cheapflights website. We also noted further information was available on the Cheapflights website but considered it was not clear where that information was located. We noted we had not seen evidence that any seats were available at the advertised prices and were concerned that the ads continued to appear in those circumstances. We considered the ads should have made clear that seats at the advertised prices might be extremely limited, or unavailable, at the time ads appeared. We considered the text "Prices subject to availability" and "Prices updated DAILY and are subject to availability. Check with the advertiser at the time of booking" was insufficient to do so and therefore concluded that the ads breached the Code.

The ads breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation) and 3.17 (Prices).

Action

The ads must not appear again in their current form. We told Cheapflights and their partners to ensure they made clear if flights at advertised prices might be extremely limited or unavailable by the time an ad appeared.

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA