Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on WDV Talent Agency London Ltd

WDV Talent Agency London Ltd t/a Larry Flynt's Hustler Club UK

Sheraton House
Lower Road
Chorleywood
Hertfordshire
WD3 5LH

Date:

4 January 2012

Media:

Regional press

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A11-171872

Ad

A regional press ad for an adult entertainment club which appeared on 15 September 2011 featured a blackboard, a pile of books on top of which sat an apple and a discarded bra.  Text stated "Back to school.  JOIN OUR SCHOOL GIRL PARTY EVERY FRIDAY FOR FOUR WEEKS STARTING 23RD SEPTEMBER.  SEE YOUR FAVOURITE HUSTLER HONEYS & STAFF IN THEIR SCHOOL UNIFORMS".

Issue

A reader challenged whether the ad was:

1. offensive and irresponsible because it promoted the idea of school children as sexual objects; and

2. unsuitable to appear in a publication which children might see.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

1. Larry Flint's Hustler Club (LFHC) said they had no intention of promoting school children as sex objects.  They said that on review of the ad, following receipt of the complaint, they acknowledged that the wording of the ad could possibly have been interpreted in the way raised by the complainant and that it may have been unwise. However, they did not believe that the ad would have caused serious or widespread offence.

Sutton Guardian explained that all ads which they believed could breach the CAP Code or could be seen as controversial by readers were referred to the editor.  They confirmed that the ad had been referred to the editor for consideration and was approved for publication.

Sutton Guardian explained that LFHC had a history of running themed events and believed that the ad reflected that.  They said it was not unusual for LFHC to encourage their staff to wear fancy dress for such an event and they did not believe any element of the ad promoted the idea of school children as sexual objects.

2. LFHC said they were very careful to ensure the ad contained no images that were unduly suggestive or any images that may have caused harm to any children who might have seen the ad.  They believed that the publication in which the ad appeared was generally aimed at an adult audience and that it had been chosen for that reason.  

Sutton Guardian did not believe the ad would have any adverse effect on any children who saw it.

Assessment

1. Not Upheld

The ASA noted the reference to 'Back to school' and associated school items such as books, a blackboard and an apple.  We considered that in the context of the ad, the claim "Join our school girl party" which appeared in conjunction with the claim "SEE YOUR FAVOURITE HUSTLER HONEYS & STAFF IN THEIR SCHOOL UNIFORMS" was likely to be understood as referring to the Hustler staff as the ones dressed in school uniform.  We noted that the ad did not feature any one dressed in school uniform.  Whilst we understood that some readers may object to the choice of theme night, we considered that the ad would be unlikely to be seen as promoting school children as sexual objects.  We concluded that the ad was not irresponsible and was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence.

On this point, we investigated the ad under CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 1.3 (Social responsibility) and 4.1 (Harm and Offence), but did not find it in breach.

2. Not Upheld

We noted the ad did not include any nudity, references to sexual activity and did not feature any one dressed in school uniform.  We noted the readership figures of the publication and that it was mostly read by adults.  Although we considered the ad was unlikely to be seen by children, we noted that it could attract the attention of some children because it was a full-page ad, that featured a blackboard and the text "back to school" and because it appeared shortly after the start of the new school term.  In any case, we considered that children who saw the ad were unlikely to understand the nature of the adult service being advertised.  We therefore concluded that the ad was unlikely to be seen by children and that the ad was not unsuitable for children to see.

On this point, we investigated the ad under CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 1.3 (Social responsibility) but did not find it in breach.

Action

No further action necessary.

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA