Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on DARH Ltd

DARH Ltd

Unit 7
Dylan Harvey Business Centre
Quebec Building
Bury Road
Salford
M3 7DU

Date:

15 February 2012

Media:

Text Message

Sector:

Financial

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A11-177301

Ad

A text message from a claims management company, received on 18 October 2011, stated "Records passed to us show you are entitled to circa £3,250 in compensation from the mis-selling of PPI on your credit card & loan.  Reply STOP or PPI for info".

Issue

1.  The complainant challenged whether the claim "Records passed to us show you are entitled to circa £3,250 in compensation from the mis-selling of PPI on your credit card & loan" was misleading and could be substantiated, because he had never taken out such cover.

2.  The ASA challenged whether the text breached the Code, because it omitted the identity of the marketer.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

DARH Ltd did not respond to the ASA's enquiries.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA was concerned by DARH's lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of the CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 1.7 (Unreasonable delay).  We reminded them of their responsibility to respond promptly to our enquiries and we told them to do so in future.  

1.  Upheld

Because DARH had not provided any evidence to show that they possessed records which indicated the complainant was entitled to circa £3,250 in compensation from the mis-selling of PPI on his credit card and loan, we considered that the claim had not been substantiated and was therefore misleading.

On this point, the ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising) and 3.7 (Substantiation).

2. Upheld

We noted that the text message did not contain information about the identity of the marketer and therefore concluded that it breached the Code.

On this point, the ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.5 (Misleading advertising) and 10.6 (Database practice).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form.  We told DARH to ensure their text messages comply with the Code in future, in particular to ensure they include details of their identity and ensure they hold adequate substantiation for claims made in their text messages.

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA