Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Superglide Wardrobes

Superglide Wardrobes

Old Carpenters Yard
Coleshill
Highworth
North Wiltshire
SN6 7PT

Date:

15 February 2012

Media:

Internet (e-tailing)

Sector:

Clothing

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A11-178619

Ad

A website for a wardrobe manufacturer, seen on 6 December, stated "2 Oak framed doors and tracks up to 2100mm wide sales offer! 10% OFF Our Oak framed sliding wardrobe doors. 2 x doors and tracks made to suite you [sic] bespoke opening. You can choose from mirror panels, coloured glass and wood grain panels. Price includes VAT and FREE delivery". The description "Oak framed" and "wood grain panels" was used for various other sizes of wardrobes on the same page.

A page on which customers could chose the size and finish of wardrobes also stated "We have a wide range of wardrobe frame colours, woodgrains, metallic and frameless options". Consumers were then presented with various options in a drop down selection, which included "Oak + £25.00".

Issue

The complainant, who had purchased a wardrobe from the website, challenged whether the description of the product as "oak framed" was misleading.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

Superglide Wardrobes said they did not believe the product description was misleading. They said the use of the word oak was descriptive of the look of the product, and that because the product was not made from oak they deliberately did not describe it as "solid wood". They said the construction of the product meant it would not be possible to construct it from solid oak, and believed that their description of the product was standard industry practice and was used by many other websites. They said that the product was made from chipboard with oak laminate. They said they had not received any customer complaints on this issue.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted that Superglide Wardrobes said they had deliberately avoided using the words "solid wood" to describe their product, and that as a result they did not believe their website was misleading. We also noted that the website did not appear to state anywhere that the product was constructed from chipboard with a laminate covering. We considered that the average consumer was likely to interpret the description "oak framed" to mean that the product's exterior frame was constructed from solid oak. As this was not the case we concluded that the claim was misleading.

The website breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 and 3.3 (Misleading advertising) and 3.7 (Substantiation).

Action

We told Superglide Wardrobes to make it clear in their product descriptions if products were not constructed from solid wood.

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA