ASA Adjudication on YBS Insulation Ltd
YBS Insulation Ltd
The Crags Industrial Park
Morven Street
Creswell
Derbyshire
S80 4AJ
Date:
15 February 2012
Media:
Magazine
Sector:
Industrial and engineering
Number of complaints:
1
Complaint Ref:
A11-147993
Ad
A magazine ad for SuperQuilt, published in January 2011, stated "SuperQuilt the highest performing multifoil insulation blanket on the market get the facts www.comparethemultifoil.com".
Issue
Web Dynamics challenged whether the claim "the highest performing multifoil insulation blanket on the market" was misleading and could be substantiated.
CAP Code (Edition 12)
Response
YBS Insulation (YBS) explained that the performance claim was based on the thermal resistance of their product compared to that of their competitors. Comparisons had been made against only those competitor products that held EN standards certification as this information could be relied upon.
YBS said SuperQuilt had been tested to British Standard EN12667 (Thermal performance of building materials and products. Determination of thermal resistance by means of guarded hotplate and heat flow meter) by BDA, which was a notified laboratory accredited for thermal testing by an EU national accreditation service and recognised by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS). They said BRE guidance (BR 443) stated that there were three standards that could be used for determining the thermal resistance of multifoils. They explained that product performance could be established either by measurement of the thermal resistance of the core according to BS EN 12664 or BS EN 12667 together with the emissivity of the surfaces or in a hot-box apparatus conforming with BS EN ISO 8990; they had chosen EN12667 for their product. They argued that BR 443 contradicted the harmonised standard BS EN 6946 used in the testing, and pointed out that the BRE document was guidance only.
YBS supplied the ASA with copies of the certification for their own and their competitors’ products, which they believed, based on the information contained in the certificates, showed their own product to be the highest performing thermal resistance multifoil available in the UK. They said all comparisons were made against products that had EN standards certification and provided a table that compared competitor products tested to EN Standards for roof thermal resistance, and where known for walls and floors.
Assessment
Not upheld
The ASA understood that the claim "the highest performing multifoil insulation blanket on the market" was based on the thermal resistance of the product compared to its competitors. Although the claim was not qualified in the ad, we considered that readers were likely to interpret it in this way. We noted YBS had compared their product against only those competitor products that held EN standards certification and considered that, in the context of the claim to be the "highest performing multifoil insulation" it would be understood that the comparison was made with only those products that held independent results which could be verified.
We understood that the comparison had been made using the thermal resistance quoted in the SuperQuilt BDA Certification and competitors' British Board of Agrément (BBA) certificates for their products. We noted SuperQuilt had been tested using a different British Standard to the one used for the competitor products, but understood that BR443 stated that any of three BS standards could be used to determine the thermal resistance of multifoils and that included the standard used by BDA, an EU accredited testing house, to test SuperQuilt.
We noted that BDA had used a heat flow meter, whereas hotbox testing had been used for the competitors' products, and understood that BR 443 required BS EN 6946 to be used to calculate thermal resistance, but the two documents appeared to offer conflicting guidance over values for an unvented airspace. However, although not agreed at the time the ad appeared, we understood that the LABC, the member organisation representing local authority building control departments, had accepted that the methods used to test SuperQuilt had followed BS EN 6946 as well as the intentions of BRE 443 and when installed, in accordance with the limitations described within the test data, would perform the function for which it was intended.
Although we noted the products had been tested using different methods, we considered that, because SuperQuilt had been tested using one of the three BS Standards recommended by BRE guidance and followed the intentions of the guidance, the comparison was fair. We noted the SuperQuilt certificate showed that the total thermal resistance for the product was higher than that shown on the certificates for competitor products that held EN standards certification and therefore concluded that the claim "the highest performing multifoil insulation blanket on the market" had been substantiated and was unlikely to mislead.
We investigated the ad under CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation) and 3.38 (Other comparisons), but did not find it in breach.
Action
No further action necessary.
Making a complaint
Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.
How to complain
Adjudications
View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.
Adjudications
Sign up
Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.
Sign up
Already registered? Log in
Follow Us
For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs
We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.
Dealing with complaints - FAQs