Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Bionetics Ltd

Bionetics Ltd

Pinehill
Pinemount Road
Camberley
Surrey
GU15 2LU

Date:

11 October 2006

Media:

National press

Sector:

Health and beauty

Number of complaints:

2

Complaint Ref:

2907

Ad

A national press ad, for a food intolerance test, that claimed "The bionetics team have developed an innovative new diagnostic test (that requires just a few strands of your hair), which can establish whether or not your body has become intolerant to 123 of the most common problem foods and ingredients ...".

Issue

The complainants challenged the efficacy of the test.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Bionetics said they were surprised by the complaint, because they had conducted many tests and had received positive responses from the majority of their customers; they sent customer testimonials as proof.  They said the technology they used was very well established and based on radionics and applied kinesiology practices, which they believed had been used for thousands of years.  They said they used a modern scanner and sophisticated computer programs; they also said their test procedures were supervised by a qualified practitioner and sent her curriculum vitae as proof of her experience.

Assessment

Complaints upheld

The ASA noted the positive customer testimonials and the training undertaken by the supervising practitioner.  Nevertheless, we considered that, without robust clinical evidence to support them, the claims that Bionetics methods of hair testing could "establish whether or not your body has become intolerant to 123 of the most common problem foods and ingredients" and "report on ... accumulations of toxins, problem pathogens and nutritional deficiencies" were not justified.   We concluded that testimonials alone were not sufficient to substantiate the efficacy of the testing methods and told Bionetics to consult the CAP Copy Advice team before advertising the test again.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness) and 50.1 (Scientific substantiation).

Action

The ad should not be repeated in its current form.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA