Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Non-broadcast Adjudication: London City Airport

London City Airport

Royal Docks
London
E16 2PB

Date:

19 April 2006

Media:

National press

Sector:

Holidays and travel

Complaint(s) from:

Kent

Complaint type:

Industry

Complaint Ref:

41186

Complaint

London Biggin Hill Airport objected to a national press ad, for an airport, that stated "LONDON CITY AIRPORT The Only Airport IN London ...". The complainants, who believed Biggin Hill, Heathrow and Northolt airports were also in London, challenged the claim " The Only Airport IN London".

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Adjudication

Complaint not upheld

London City Airport (LCA) said they intended to challenge consumers' perceptions of the location of "London" airports, because they believed LCA was the only airport within the real boundaries of London; they argued that airports situated in the Home Counties and beyond should not be advertised as "in" London. They believed the Royal Mail did not regard Heathrow Airport's postcode, TW6, to be within the London postal area, but pointed out that their E16 postcode was undeniably a London address. They stated that Hounslow, the London borough in which Heathrow Airport was located, was a greater London borough, in contrast to the centrally located City of London. They also pointed out that LCA was the only airport with an inner London telephone code.

The ASA noted LCA was one of seven airports that had been given a London classification by the International Air Transport Association. Nevertheless, we considered that readers would understand the claim " The Only Airport IN London" to mean that LCA differentiated itself from the other airports serving London by virtue of being the only airport located in central London. Because the other airports serving London were located on the outskirts of London, in the Home Counties and beyond, we considered that readers were unlikely to be misled by the claim.

We investigated the ad under CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation) and 7.1 (Truthfulness), but did not find it in breach.

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA