Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Non-broadcast Adjudication: Studio 1 Promotions

Studio 1 Promotions

61 Great Underbank
Stockport
SK1 1LE

Date:

17 May 2006

Media:

Direct mail

Sector:

Employment

Complaint(s) from:

Surrey

Complaint type:

Public

Complaint Ref:

41304

Complaint

A direct mailing, for a talent agency, stated " ... Please find below the most frequently asked questions and our answers? Q. Who are you? A. We are a photographic model agency supplying models to photographers, Advertising agencies, Catalouges [sic], Roadshows e.t.c. We also supply stand by artists to TV & Film. Q. How far will I have to travel if I am selected for a job? A. This is impossible to answer as we are a growing agency and work is happening nationwide. One of our models have [sic] just completed a job in Costa Brava, Spain. However, Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds and of course London are the most likely ... Q. What clients have used you [sic] company in the past? A. There are far too many to list, however see below for a small number. Schwarzkopf Hair Products Matalan Channel 4 Benson Beds The Cosmopolitan Magazine Yates Wine Lodge SKY TV Various road shows The Daily Mirror Lucozade BBC Various TV commericals Littlewoods Catalogue Ethel Austin's ITV Various catwalk shows ...". The complainant challenged whether Studio 1 Promotions could substantiate that:

1. one of their models had recently completed a job in Costa Brava, Spain and

2. they had supplied models to the clients quoted in the mailing, for example Channel 4, BBC and ITV.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Adjudication

1. & 2. Complaint upheld

Studio 1 Promotions said all the claims in their mailing were genuine.

The ASA noted Studio 1 Promotions had sent no evidence to substantiate that one of their models had recently completed a job in Costa Brava, Spain or that they had supplied models to the clients quoted in the mailing. We reminded Studio 1 Promotions of the Code's requirement for advertisers to hold documentary evidence to prove their claims. We considered that, in the absence of any substantiation, the claims were misleading and told Studio 1 Promotions to remove them from their advertising.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 6.1 (Honesty) and 7.1 (Truthfulness).

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA