Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Government Assistance Programmes

Government Assistance Programmes

145-147 St Johns Street
London
EC1V 4PY

Date:

31 January 2007

Media:

Direct mail

Sector:

Financial

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

10411

Ad


A direct mailing, for assisted government grants, contained a loose page headed: “Grants Loans Assistance Getting the inside story on government funding How you can acquire money real quick”. A yellow post-it was attached to the promotion with a handwritten inscription that stated: “Aziz call it’s brilliant! J”. The promotion appeared to be torn along one side and the pages numbered, giving the impression that it had been ripped from a magazine.

Issue

The complainant thought the inclusion of the post-it misleadingly implied someone known to him had sent the mailing that featured his name and stated "Aziz call its brilliant! J".

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

The Government Assistance Programmes (GAP) said the yellow post-it-note attached to the ad was not personalised, it did not say it had been sent by a friend, family member or anyone else.  They said it was clear the promotion was an ad because it had advertisement printed in the far right-hand corner.  They said the purpose of the ad was to encourage recipients to ring the number at the bottom of the promotion.  GAP said they would be happy to amend the ad in line with the recommendation.

Assessment

 

Upheld

The ASA noted GAPs comments but considered that because the word advertisement appeared in a very small font size in the right-hand corner, it could be easily overlooked by recipients.  We welcomed GAPs assurances to amend the ad.  However, we were particularly concerned that the mailing, which looked as if it had been torn from a magazine and had a post-it note attached with a handwritten inscription, implied that it had been sent by someone known to the recipient.  Because it had not, we considered the mailing was misleading.  We were concerned that the mailing was not immediately recognisable as an ad and that its design was likely to mislead recipients.   

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 6.1 (Honesty), 7.1 (Truthfulness) and 22.1 (Recognising marketing communications and identifying marketers).

Action

The ad should not appear in the same form again.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA