Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on BritChiro Clinics Ltd

BritChiro Clinics Ltd

13 West Street
Horsham
West Sussex
RH12 1PB

Date:

15 October 2008

Media:

Radio

Sector:

Health and beauty

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

63222

Ad

A radio ad, for chiropractic clinics, stated "Do you suffer with arthritic pain? Does it hurt in your shoulder, elbow, wrist, knee or ankle? If so BritChiro could help. Multi-award winning chiropractors, we've achieved excellent results with people of all ages. Our highly professional doctors of chiropractic have years of experience and are committed to patients' health ...".

Issue

The Carlton Clinic challenged whether the claim "doctors of chiropractic" misleadingly implied that the practitioners held general medical qualifications.

BCAP Radio Code

 2 - 3

Response

The Radio Advertising Clearance Centre (RACC) said, prior to broadcast, they had checked the qualifications of BritChiro Clinics (BritChiro) and found that they were professionally recognised qualifications. The RACC said, given the qualifications, they believed the term "professional doctors of chiropractic" was not misleading in context. They said they did not agree that listeners were likely to infer from the ad that Britchiros practitioners were medically qualified as well as chiropractic qualified.

Assessment

Not Upheld

The ASA noted the title Dr was not used in the ad as a practitioners title and considered that listeners were therefore likely to understand from the claim "doctors of chiropractic" that BritChiros practitioners practised chiropractic rather than medicine. While we considered that Doctor of Chiropractic would not be an adequate qualification in an ad referring to a practitioner as Dr, we considered that, used on its own as a description of a practitioners profession, it was unlikely to mislead listeners about the nature of practitioners qualifications or to be interpreted as a claim that they held general medical qualifications.

We investigated the ad under CAP (Broadcast) Radio Advertising Standards Code section 2 rule 3 (Misleadingness) but did not find it in breach.

Action

No further action necessary.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA