Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Airline Network plc

Airline Network plc

Goldmedal Travel
The Trident Centre
Portway Ribble Docklands
Preston
Lancashire
PR2 2QA

Date:

26 March 2008

Media:

E-mail

Sector:

Holidays and travel

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

43580

Ad

A promotional e-mail, for Airline Network, entitled “5 days to book - USA £195 & more great savings”, listed flight prices to various long haul destinations, for example “New York £195 Orlando £250 Las Vegas £269 … Dubai £279 Bangkok £445 … Sydney £638”. “From” prices were listed for car hire and hotels. A disclaimer in small text at the bottom of the e-mail stated “All flight prices quoted include all pre-payable airport taxes but exclude Airline Failure Protection charge … Quoted ‘from’ prices are per person, and are correct at time of publishing, but are subject to change and availability, which may be limited. Please go to www.airline-network.co.uk to confirm current prices and availability.”

Issue

Lastminute.com:

1. pointed out that the £5 Airline Failure Protection (AFP) charge was mandatory and should therefore have been included in the advertised price and

2. objected that the flights were not available at the advertised prices plus the AFP charge.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Airline Network did not respond to the ASAs enquiries.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA was concerned by Airline Network's lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code clause 2.6 (Non-response). We reminded them of their obligations under the Code and told them to respond promptly in future.

We noted the small print stated that prices excluded the AFP charge. We also noted from Airline Networks website that it was not possible to remove the charge when it was offered with a flight. Because it was not optional, we considered that the charge should have been included in the advertised flight prices. We also considered that we had not seen evidence to show that a reasonable proportion of flights were available at the advertised fares plus the AFP charge. We concluded that the ad was likely to mislead.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 2.6 (Non-response), (7.1 (Truthfulness), 15.2 (Prices), 16.1 (Availability of products) and 27.4 (Sales Promotion Rules)

Action

We told Airline Network to include the AFP charge in quoted prices where applicable, and to ensure that they could demonstrate the availability of advertised fares in future. We also told them to prefix fares with the word "from" when not all flights were available at the advertised fare. We asked CAP to inform its media members of the problem with Airline Network.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA