ASA Adjudication on Church & Dwight UK Ltd
Church & Dwight UK Ltd
Wear Bay Road
Folkestone
Kent
CT19 6PG
Date:
27 August 2008
Media:
Television
Sector:
Health and beauty
Number of complaints:
1
Complaint Ref:
60332
Ad
A TV ad for a toothpaste was fronted by children's television presenter Katy Hill dressed in white. She said "If you've got sensitive teeth like me this is real important news. No more grief, a major breakthrough, a toothpaste that will not just mask the problem but fix it ... new Arm and Hammer Enamel Care Sensitive with liquid calcium fixes the cause of sensitivity by sealing teeth and closing off exposed nerves ... In replenishing the enamel it also restores your teeth to their former whiteness ... new Arm and Hammer Enamel Care Sensitive - Fix the Cause of Sensitivity."
Issue
GlaxoSmithKline challenged the claims "will not just mask the problem but fix it", "fixes the cause of sensitivity by sealing teeth and closing off exposed nerves" and "Fix the cause of sensitivity" because they believed these were medicinal claims and should not be made unless the product held a marketing authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
BCAP TV Code
Response
Clearcast responded on Church & Dwight UK Ltd (Church & Dwight)'s behalf. They said they had vetted the copy for the ad carefully at the production stage, in conjunction with their consultant dentist. They said the product did not hold a marketing authorisation from the MHRA. They said they believed whether or not the claims could be considered medicinal were a matter of interpretation and ultimately a matter for the MHRA, but they said they had considered the claims were reasonable without one.
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA did not consider evidence for the efficacy of Arm and Hammer Enamel Care Sensitive. We understood from the MHRA that the claims "will not just mask the problem but fix it"; "fixes the cause of sensitivity by sealing teeth and closing off exposed nerves" and "Fix the cause of sensitivity" were medicinal claims. Because Arm and Hammer had made medicinal claims without holding the appropriate marketing authorisation, we concluded that the ad breached the Code.
The ad breached CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code rules 8.2.3 and 8.2.9 (Medicines, Health Claims, Treatments and Nutrition).
Action
The ad should not be broadcast again until Arm and Hammer have obtained the relevant marketing authorisation.
Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)
Making a complaint
Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.
How to complain
Adjudications
View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.
Adjudications
Sign up
Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.
Sign up
Already registered? Log in
Follow Us
For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs
We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.
Dealing with complaints - FAQs