ASA Adjudication on Claim Management UK Ltd

Claim Management UK Ltd

Communications House
26 York Street
London
W1U 6PZ

Date:

28 October 2009

Media:

Text Message

Sector:

Financial

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

101051

Ad

An SMS text message, sent to private individuals' mobile telephones, stated "CMUK. DO YOU HAVE DEBT ON CREDIT CARDS + LOANS? THE DEBT MAY BE UNENFORCEABLE! FOR INFO CALL 01792 473533. OPT OUT TEXT '0'".

Issue

1. A complainant, who understood that marketers required permission from recipients before sending text messages to them, objected that the text was sent unsolicited.

2.  The complainant also challenged whether the text had made sufficiently clear the identity of the advertiser.

3. The ASA challenged whether the claim exaggerated the likelihood of being able to write off the debts.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Claim Management UK Ltd (Claim Management) said they worked from a referral database on which they did not hold any key notes and could not specify from where the recipients details had been obtained. They said that they officially stopped using marketing text messages after several failed attempts to comply with the relevant authorities and had no intention of using text message advertising in the future because it was impossible to make this method of advertising work within the given parameters.

Assessment

1. Upheld

The ASA noted Claim Management had not provided evidence to demonstrate that the complainant had given permission for Claim Managements ads to be sent to them by SMS text message and concluded that the ad breached the Code on Database practice. .

On this point the ad breached CAP Code clause 43.4c (Database practices).

   

2. Upheld

We noted the abbreviation "CMUK" had been used in the SMS text message but reminded Claim Management that mobile marketing communications should contain the full name of the marketers concerned.  We concluded that the ad breached the CAP Code rules on identifying marketers. .

On this point the ad breached CAP Code clause 22.2 (Recognising marketing communications and identifying marketers).

3. Upheld

We noted Claim Management had not supplied evidence to show that recipients were likely to get debts wiped out.  Furthermore, we were concerned that the ASA had upheld a previous complaint due to Claim Managements failure to substantiate a similar claim. We concluded that the claim was misleading.

On this point the ad breached CAP Code clause 7.1 and 7.2 (Truthfulness).

Action

We reminded Claim Management of their responsibility to comply with the CAP Code provisions on Database Practice and told them not to use marketing text messages in the future unless they could prove they complied with the Code.  

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Login

ASA job vacancies

The ASA is currently recruiting for a Communications and Marketing Manager (p/t)

Current vacancies

Advice and guidance for Advertisers

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website. To get bespoke advice on your ad before it is published, you can visit the

Copy Advice website

Copyright © 2009 ASA