ASA Adjudication on Chefaro UK Ltd

Chefaro UK Ltd

Bristol & West House
Post Office Road
Bournemouth
BH1 1BL

Date:

11 February 2009

Media:

Television

Sector:

Health and beauty

Number of complaints:

1

Agency:

Norris Lincoln Adcom

Complaint Ref:

73915

Ad

A TV ad, for wart and verruca removal treatments. The ad showed a young boy being treated by his mother; the boy's voice-over stated "The doctor used to freeze my warts, now mum's found Wartner". The ad showed an image of the product being sprayed on a wart; on-screen text stated "In 10 days the wart should disappear". Another voice-over stated "Effective and easy to use. Wartner freezes warts and verrucas to the core in one treatment". Pack shots of the warts and verruca treatment were shown on screen; on-screen text stated "Wartner freezes warts and verrucas to the core in one treatment".

Issue

The complainant, who had tried the verruca treatment several times on several people without it working, challenged whether the ad misleadingly implied the product was effective at removing verrucas in one treatment.

BCAP TV Code

Response

Chefaro UK (Chefaro) pointed out that the ad stated that Wartner could freeze to the core in one treatment, not that it removed warts or verrucas in one treatment. They said the product might not have worked for the complainant if he had not applied it correctly.

Clearcast said they had been sent a dossier of evidence on the product and were satisfied that it worked. They said they had sent the evidence to their consultant who was also satisfied. Clearcast sent a copy of a CE certificate for Wartner, a test on the temperature it achieved, two testimonials from dermatologists, customer research, an expert report on product safety and the product packaging and instruction leaflet.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA considered that the ad, particularly the voice-over and on-screen text "Wartner freezes warts and verrucas to the core in one treatment", implied that Wartner would remove a wart or verruca in one treatment. We noted the evidence did not prove that that was the case; rather the safety report and Wartner packaging stated that two or three treatments could be required and the testimonials did not comment on whether the product removed warts or verrucas in one treatment. We considered that, because Wartner did not remove all warts or verrucas in one treatment, the ad was likely to mislead.

The ad breached CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code rules 5.1 (Misleading advertising), 5.2.1 (Evidence) and 5.2.2 (Implications).

Action

The ad must not be broadcast again in its current form.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Login

ASA job vacancies

The ASA is currently recruiting for a Communications and Marketing Manager (p/t)

Current vacancies

Advice and guidance for Advertisers

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website. To get bespoke advice on your ad before it is published, you can visit the

Copy Advice website

Copyright © 2009 ASA