Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on DFS Trading Ltd

DFS Trading Ltd

1 Rockingham Way
Redhouse Interchange
Adwick-le-Street
Doncaster
South Yorkshire
DN6 7NA

Date:

26 August 2009

Media:

Television

Sector:

Household

Number of complaints:

1

Agency:

Uber

Complaint Ref:

96727

Ad

A TV ad for the DFS half price sale, on the 'Zeta' collection, showed a large orange corner sofa with a moveable back. A further five sofas were also shown with their normal selling price crossed out to show the sale price. At two different points in the ad, two women wrote "Half Price" on the camera lens. The voice-over said "If you want a new sofa, then today and this bank holiday you should go to DFS. You'll get the sofa you want at a price you will like because right now you can get half price on a sofa that's your style … come and see the half price Zeta collection at DFS."

Issue

One viewer challenged whether the ad was misleading, because the orange sofa featured in the ad was not included in the half price sale.

BCAP TV Code

Response

DFS disagreed that the ad was misleading.  They said it featured four sofas alongside pricing information; those sofas were part of the 'Zeta' collection and were half price.  The ad also featured two sofas without pricing information; those sofas were not part of the Zeta collection and were therefore not half price.  DFS said they had been careful to ensure that no voice-over or graphic mentioning the price promotion was shown at the same time as either of the sofas not included in the promotion.  They said they had used a similar approach in previous ads without complaint.

Clearcast said they cleared the ad on the understanding that all featured sofas were part of the 'Zeta' collection and were half price.  Clearcast said, if they had known that some of the sofas shown in the ad were not included in the sale, they would not have approved it for transmission.  

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted no price was shown on-screen in relation to the orange sofa and the voice-over did not mention the half price sale when it was shown.  We nevertheless considered that, in the context of an ad promoting a half price sale on sofas in a particular range, viewers were likely to infer that all sofas shown were part of that range and included in the half price sale.  Because we understood that two sofas featured in the ad were excluded from the sale, we concluded that the ad was misleading.

The ad breached CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code rules 5.1.1, 5.1.2 and 5.1.3 (Misleadingness).

Action

The ad must not be broadcast again in its current form.  

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA