Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on The Dorset Magazine Ltd

The Dorset Magazine Ltd t/a Dorset Life

7 The Leanne
Sandford Lane
Wareham
Dorset
BH20 4DY

Date:

17 March 2010

Media:

Magazine

Sector:

Publishing

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

115364

Ad

A front-page flash, on Dorset Life magazine, stated "The best-read county magazine in Dorset".

Issue

Archant Life challenged whether the claim was misleading and could be substantiated.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

Dorset Life said "best-read" was the superlative of the adjective "well read" and, when applied to a magazine, referred to the quality of the magazine, the extent of research, the intellectual level of its content, and an assumption on the part of the writers of the degree of knowledge of its readers. They accepted that comparing such characteristics between publications was a subjective judgement, but believed a brief evaluation of their magazine and their nearest competitor would substantiate their claim. They said the claim could also be interpreted to mean that their magazine was the best Dorset county magazine to read.

Dorset Life said, although they did not intend the claim to refer to circulation or sales figures, they believed that that interpretation was nonetheless valid and supplied the ASA with figures that they believed showed they sold more copies than their nearest competitor.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted Dorset Life's argument that "The best-read county magazine in Dorset" referred to the quality of the magazine, but considered this was unclear and was likely to be understood to be a reference to their readership or sales figures. We also considered that, because of the way the claim was worded, it was unlikely to be interpreted to mean that Dorset Life was the best county magazine to read. We noted the sales figures provided by Dorset Life but, because the sales figures for the competitor magazine were estimated, we did not consider them to be sufficiently robust substantiation for a "best-selling" claim.

We concluded that, because it implied a "best-selling" claim, which was not supported, and not Dorset Lifes own opinion about the quality of their magazine, it was likely to mislead.

The front-page flash breached CAP Code clause 7.1 (Truthfulness).

Action

The front-page flash must not be used again in its current form.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA