Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on One Solution

One Solution t/a onesolutionsecurity.co.uk

21 Stanford Crescent
Liverpool
Merseyside
L25 9PJ

Date:

18 August 2010

Media:

Leaflet

Sector:

Business

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

126566

Ad

A leaflet, for a security company, showed a photo of a woman with a man’s leather-gloved hand covering her mouth and a frightened expression on her face. Text stated “MANY PEOPLE DON’T CONSIDER THE FULL IMPLICATIONS OF A BREAK IN UNTIL IT’S TOO LATE!” and “One Solution FIRE & SECURITY” and promoted the installation or upgrade of a CCTV, alarm, fire or access system.

Issue

The complainant, who had picked the leaflet up in a local cafe, objected that the image was offensive and distressing, and that the ad made an undue appeal to peoples fears about home security.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

One Solution did not respond to the ASA's enquiries in writing, but stated verbally that the ad reflected the reality of burglaries and break-ins at the present time, which were distressing.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted that the CAP Code allowed marketers to use an appeal to fear to encourage prudent behaviour but that the fear aroused should not be disproportionate to the risk. Although we acknowledged that the ad was for a security system and it was not inappropriate for the advertisers to make reference to the issue of home security, we noted that the ad featured a woman in distress, who appeared to be being threatened with violence in her own home and considered that that image, in conjunction with the text "PEOPLE DON'T CONSIDER THE FULL IMPLICATIONS OF A BREAK IN UNTIL ITS TOO LATE" was likely to cause undue fear or distress, especially to the elderly or those living alone.

Because we considered that the ad relied on a shocking and distressing image and text to attract attention, we concluded that it made an undue appeal to peoples fears about home security and was likely to cause fear and distress.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 5.1 (Decency), 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3 (Fear and distress).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA