Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on ASDA Stores Ltd

ASDA Stores Ltd

Asda House
Great Wilson Street
Leeds
LS11 5AD

Date:

29 September 2010

Media:

Internet (sales promotion)

Sector:

Retail

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

132090

Ad

An online sales promotion for Asda opticians stated, "Our special World Cup offer: Free eye tests for all Uruguayans Like everyone in England, we couldn't believe our eyes when the Uruguayan referee and linesman failed to recognise Frank Lampard's equalising goal against Germany. We're responding by offering all Uruguayans a free eye test to avoid anything like this happeneing [sic] again. All you have to do is bring your passport into any Asda opticians ... Optical buying manager Nik Langrish-Dixon says: 'Let's face it - it could have been a very different game had the disallowed goal been counted. After the linesman's slip-up our expert opticians are concerned about the state of his Urug-eyes, so we're offering anyone with a Uruguay passport a free eye test' ... ".


Issue

The complainant, a British-Uruguayan, objected that the ad was offensive.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

ASDA Stores Ltd (Asda) apologised for any offence the offer caused and said they did not intend to cause widespread offence. They said in future marketing campaigns Asda Opticians would extend such offers to all FIFA registered referees and their assistants. They confirmed that 15 customers had taken advantage of the offer of a free eye test.

Assessment

Not upheld

We understood that the promotion was intended to be light-hearted and humorous, exploiting the controversy resulting from the Germany and England World Cup game. In that context, while we acknowledged the attempt at humour might be distasteful to some, we considered that most readers of the ad would interpret it as football banter rather than malice towards Uruguayans. Because of that, we concluded that the ad was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence.

We investigated the ad under CAP Code (Edition 11) clause 5.1 (Decency), but did not find it in breach.

Action

No further action necessary.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Making a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Non-compliant online advertisers

Check the list of non-compliant online advertisers.

Non-compliant online advertisers

Sign up

Sign up for adjudications alerts and newsletters.

Sign up

Already registered? Log in

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
ASA_UK

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

We work hard to ensure our complaints procedures are transparent. Here we answer some commonly asked questions about how we handle complaints.

Dealing with complaints - FAQs

Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QT  |  Copyright © 2012 ASA