ASA Adjudication on Joanne Buckley

Joanne Buckley

Apartment 302
784-788 High Road
Leyton
London
E10 6AE

Date:

23 July 2008

Media:

Magazine

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

2

Complaint Ref:

57628

Ad

A magazine ad, for a spiritual advisor named Joanne Buckley, stated "GET READY TO CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOR THE BETTER Is your heart broken? Have you lost a love to another? Do you love someone from afar? Are you in turmoil? Are you at a X roads and unsure which direction to take? ARE YOU TIRED OF ALWAYS BEING THE LOSER IN LIFE? I can help you! I guarantee that you will be thrilled and amazed with the results or I will return your payment." Contact details were given at the foot of the ad.

Issue

Two complainants, both of whom had commissioned Joanne Buckley to perform spiritual work, challenged whether:

1. the ad misleadingly implied that her services were certain to work; and

2. the claim "I guarantee that you will be thrilled and amazed with the results or I will return your payment" was misleading and could be substantiated, because she failed to refund the money they had paid her when her work proved unsuccessful.

CAP Code

Response

Joanne Buckley did not respond to the ASA's enquiries.

Assessment

1. & 2. Upheld

The ASA was concerned by Joanne Buckley's lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code clause 2.6 (Non-response).  We reminded her of her obligations under the Code and told her to respond promptly in future.

We considered that readers of the ad were likely to infer from the claim "I guarantee that you will be thrilled and amazed with the results ..." that Joanne Buckley was confident that her services would produce positive results for her customers.  We noted the CAP Help Note on the Marketing of Spiritual and Psychic Services, Astrologers and Lucky Charms stated that "Claims that marketers will successfully solve all problems, break curses, banish evil spirits, improve the health, wealth love life, happiness or other circumstances of readers should be avoided because they are likely to be impossible to prove."  We were concerned that, despite the promise of a refund if they were not satisfied with her work, neither complainant had been able to obtain one.  Because we considered that the ad misleadingly implied that Joanne Buckley's service was certain to work and because we had not seen evidence to show that she refunded dissatisfied clients, we concluded that the ad was misleading.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 2.6 (Non-response), 3.1 (Substantiation), 6.1 (Honesty), 7.1 (Truthfulness), 17.1 and 17.3 (Guarantees).

Action

We told Joanne Buckley to withdraw the ad and asked CAP to inform its media members of the problem with Joanne Buckley.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Log a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Sign in here

View the full content of this site and to keep up-to-date with ASA news.

Sign in

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Enquiries

If you have a general query about the work of the ASA, please read our Frequently Asked Questions as you may find your answer in this section instantly.

FAQs

Key facts and figures

Read some of our key facts and figures.

Key facts and figures

Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP)

The advertising rules are written by the advertising industry through two Committees: the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP).

CAP website

Copyright © 2009 ASA