ASA Adjudication on BMW (UK) Ltd

BMW (UK) Ltd

Ellesfield Avenue
Bracknell
Berkshire
RG12 8TA

Date:

28 July 2010

Media:

National press

Sector:

Motoring

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

127132

Ad

A press ad for BMV stated “100% JOY 0% EMISSIONS". The ad went on to state “The BMW Concept ActiveE is the first BMW to be powered purely by electricity … Thanks to its electrifying performance and zero CO2 emissions when driving, the ActiveE redefines BMW EfficientDynamics". The small print stated “BMW EfficientDynamics reduces BMW emissions without compromising performance development”.

Issue

The complainant challenged whether the claims "0% EMISSIONS" and "zero CO2 when driving" were misleading, because they understood that the car needed to be charged with electricity from the National Grid, which would result in the production of emissions.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Response

BMW explained that the headline claim "0% EMISSIONS" was supported in the body copy by the claim "zero CO2 emissions when driving". They believed that the inclusion of the phrase "when driving" limited the claim to when the car was in use and did not suggest the car was zero carbon across its life cycle.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA understood that the BMW Concept ActiveE was a concept car that needed to be powered by electricity to operate. We considered that the claim "0% emissions" was likely to be interpreted by readers to mean that the cars use would not result in the production of emissions. We noted that the vehicle was only able to operate because it had been charged with electricity from the National Grid, which would result in the production of emissions, contrary to the claim "0% emissions". We also noted that previous ASA adjudications for electric cars and products had concluded that, when electric vehicles were powered by electricity from the National Grid, with a fuel-mix predominantly from non-renewable sources, a zero emissions claim was likely to mislead.

We considered that the inclusion of the phrase "when driving" was contradictory to the overall zero emission claim and the impression that the cars use would not result in the production of emissions. We therefore concluded that the claims "0% emissions" and "zero CO2 emissions when driving" were likely to mislead.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness) and 49.1, 49.2 (Environmental claims).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form. We told BMW not to repeat claims that stated or implied that an electric vehicle would produce zero emissions in use.

Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)

Log a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

How to complain

Sign in here

View the full content of this site and to keep up-to-date with ASA news.

Sign in

Adjudications

View our latest weekly ASA adjudications or search for rulings from the last five years.

Adjudications

Enquiries

If you have a general query about the work of the ASA, please read our Frequently Asked Questions as you may find your answer in this section instantly.

FAQs

Key facts and figures

Read some of our key facts and figures.

Key facts and figures

Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP)

The advertising rules are written by the advertising industry through two Committees: the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP).

CAP website

Copyright © 2009 ASA