Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Non-broadcast Adjudication: Foxglove Clinic

Foxglove Clinic

1 Globe Crescent
Farnham
Bishop's Stortford
Hertfordshire
CM23 1HA

Date:

25 February 2004

Media:

Regional press

Sector:

Health and beauty

Complaint(s) from:

West Glamorgan

Complaint type:

Public

Complaint Ref:

37419

Complaint

Objection to a regional press advertisement for slimming pills. The advertisement stated "OVERWEIGHT? LOSE 5lb-7lb per week without effort, safely. Medical slimming pills, free information pack tel Jim ...".

1. The complainant objected that the quoted weight loss of 5lb-7lb a week was dangerous and not in line with sound nutritional advice.

2. The Authority challenged whether the advertisers were selling "medical slimming pills" as claimed.

CAP Code (Edition 11)

Ruling

The advertisers asserted that they had not requested the wording used in the advertisement and it was no longer in use.

1. Complaint upheld

The advertisers said a major campaign by the Government was underway to reduce obesity. They maintained the claim "you may lose 5lbs-7lbs in a week" was reasonable advice because obesity was life threatening and led directly to high blood pressure, heart disease and diabetes. The advertisers said they provided strict safeguards for their clients as well as nutritional advice but did not send evidence to support that. The Authority considered that to claim a weight loss of 5-7lbs per week was contrary to good medical advice. It was concerned that the advertisers had not sent evidence of trials to show the efficacy of their product. It reminded the advertisers that marketing communications should not state that precise amounts of weight could be lost within a stated period and in order to advertise treatment for obesity they should hold evidence that they provide suitably qualified supervision. The Authority told the advertisers not to use the claim again.

2. Upheld

The advertisers said they had not placed an advertisement for a prescription only medicine but acknowledged the advertisement contained small errors, which they had amended. They said non-prescription medicines were frequently tested clinically. The Authority was concerned that the advertisers had not sent evidence to support the claim ''medical slimming pills''. It reminded the advertisers that medicinal claims should not be made for products unauthorised by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The Authority told the advertisers to seek help from the Committee of Advertising Practice Copy Advice team before advertising again.

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
 

How to comply with the rules

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website.

Make a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

Press Zone

This section is for journalists only. Here you will be able to access embargoed material, breaking news and briefing papers as well as profile details for the ASA press office.