Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Ebuyer (UK) Ltd

Ebuyer (UK) Ltd

Howden
East Yorkshire
DN14 7UW

Date:

7 December 2011

Media:

Internet (e-tailing)

Sector:

Retail

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A11-172032

Background

 

Ad

A website, for an online retailer, stated "Foehn & Hirsch Portable WiFi Internet Radio (Black)" and showed four and a half stars. Further text stated "17 reviews".

Issue

The complainant, who saw the ad on 17 September, challenged whether the claim "17 reviews" alongside the four and a half stars were misleading, because they believed the reviews displayed were selected to create a favourable impression.

 

 

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

Ebuyer (UK) Ltd (Ebuyer) said reviews were submitted by customers and approved by project managers. They said current filters were pre-set to show those ratings which were most useful but that this could change and that, unless they showed the lowest rating first, reviews would always be more positive than negative.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted Ebuyer said the reviews were submitted by customers, approved by project managers and pre-set to show ratings they believed would be most useful to consumers. However, we considered that negative reviews were likely to be as useful to consumers as positive reviews and understood that the complainant had submitted a negative review which had not been displayed. We also considered most readers would understand the claim "17 reviews", alongside the four and a half stars out of five, to mean that the reviews displayed were representative of the subjective opinion of customers and that, by omitting negative reviews, Ebuyer created a favourable impression that was likely to mislead consumers into purchasing the product. We noted they said four and a half stars was an actual score but did not receive any information as to how this score was calculated.  We concluded that the claim was materially misleading.

 

The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1, 3.3 and 3.6 (Misleading advertising).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form. We told Ebuyer not to mislead consumers by selecting material to create a favourable impression.

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
 

How to comply with the rules

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website.

Make a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

Press Zone

This section is for journalists only. Here you will be able to access embargoed material, breaking news and briefing papers as well as profile details for the ASA press office.