Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on The Maxim Creative Group Ltd

The Maxim Creative Group Ltd

Unit 7, Osborne Industrial Estate
Osborne Mill
Osborne Street
Chadderton
Oldham
OL9 6QQ

Date:

3 August 2011

Media:

Magazine

Sector:

Business

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A11-157056

Ad

An ad, in Retail Design and Technology magazine, dated 25 April 2011. The ad featured a photograph of a woman who had been gagged. Text stated “MAXIMUM DOMINATION CONTROLLING YOUR RETAIL ENVIROMENT...”

Issue

The complainant challenged whether the ad was offensive, because it was demeaning to women.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

The Maxim Creative Group (Maxim) said the ad was not intended to be demeaning to women. They said the ad was a play on the words used more than the image. They understood that the readership of the magazine was exclusively adults.

Dream Creative Solutions (Dream), the publisher of Retail Design and Technology magazine, stated that they had received only one complaint about the ad. They explained that the publication in which the ad appeared was distributed on a monthly basis to 6,000 regular readers in hard copy and to 14,000 readers in digital format.

Dream believed that the ad was risqué, but that it was not offensive or derogatory to women. They believed that the ad was purely a play on words and given that their readership was exclusively adult, they considered the ad to be acceptable.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted that the readership of Retail Design and Technology magazine was exclusively adult. We also noted that the images were highly stylised and that the woman was shown in a strong and confident pose.

However, we noted that the text in the ad made reference to domination and control and considered that readers were likely to interpret the use of such references in conjunction with an image of a woman who had been gagged to be demeaning to women.

On that basis, we concluded that ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence.

The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 4.1 (Harm and offence)

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form.

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
 

How to comply with the rules

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website.

Make a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

Press Zone

This section is for journalists only. Here you will be able to access embargoed material, breaking news and briefing papers as well as profile details for the ASA press office.