Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on Quality Conservatories Ltd

Quality Conservatories Ltd

80 Halewood Road
Woolton
Gateacre
Lancashire
L25 5PF

Date:

23 May 2012

Media:

Internet (on own site)

Sector:

Household

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A12-189724

Background

Summary of Council decision:

Four issues were investigated of which all four were Upheld.

Ad

The website www.qualityconservatoriesltd.co.uk, visited on 1 March 2012, stated "Quality Conservatories are a well established company who offer a 10 year insurance backed guarantee with deposit indemnity" and featured the FENSA logo with "Registered Company" underneath and the Home Improvement Protection logo. Text on the 'About Us' page read "Quality Conservatories have over 50 years experience in designing, manufacturing & installing conservatories" and additional text on the 'Recommendations' page stated "We are delighted that the majority of our business comes from customers [sic] recommendations. Please find below a brief selection of the letters that we receive" and was followed by two testimonials from "Mr & Mrs B. Stockport" and "Mr G. Mc".

Issue

The complainant challenged whether:

1. the claim "Quality Conservatories ... offer a 10 year insurance backed guarantee with deposit indemnity" was misleading and could be substantiated;

2. the claim "Quality Conservatories have over 50 years experience in designing, manufacturing & installing conservatories" was misleading and could be substantiated;

3. the testimonials were genuine, because they understood that both testimonials had appeared on other conservatory companies' websites; and

4. the use of the FENSA and Home Improvement Protections trust marks was misleading.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

Quality Conservatories Ltd did not respond to the ASA's enquiries.

Assessment

The ASA was concerned by Quality Conservatories' lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 1.7 (Unreasonable delay). We reminded them of their responsibility to respond promptly to our enquiries and we told them to do so in future.

1. Upheld

Because we had not seen any evidence that Quality Conservatories offered a 10-year insurance backed guarantee with deposit indemnity, we concluded that the claim had not been substantiated and was therefore likely to mislead.

On this point, the claim breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising) and 3.7 (Substantiation).

2. Upheld

Because we had not seen any evidence from Quality Conservatories that they had over 50 years' experience in designing, manufacturing and installing conservatories, we concluded that the claim had not been substantiated and was therefore likely to mislead.

On this point, the claim breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising) and 3.7 (Substantiation).

3. Upheld

We noted that the testimonials appeared word-for-word on another website for a different conservatory company. Because of that, and because we had not seen evidence from Quality Conservatories that the testimonials were genuine and related to their products, we concluded that the testimonials breached the Code.

On this point, the testimonials breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.45 and 3.46 (Endorsements and Testimonials)

4. Upheld

Because we had not seen evidence from Quality Conservatories that they were registered with FENSA (Fenestration Self-Assessment Scheme) or that they were a Home Improvement Protection approved company, we considered that the display of those organisation's trust marks was likely to mislead.

On this point, the use of the logos breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation) and 3.50 (Endorsements and Testimonials).

Action

The claims, testimonials and trust marks must not appear again in their current form. We told Quality Conservatories to ensure that they held adequate substantiation for objective claims, documentary evidence to show their testimonials were genuine and the necessary authorisation for the trust marks they displayed in future. We referred the matter to CAP's Compliance team.

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
 

How to comply with the rules

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website.

Make a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

Press Zone

This section is for journalists only. Here you will be able to access embargoed material, breaking news and briefing papers as well as profile details for the ASA press office.