Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on kgb (UK) Ltd

kgb (UK) Ltd

Sterling House
Malthouse Avenue
Cardiff Gate Business Centre
Cardiff
CF23 8RA

Date:

5 September 2012

Media:

E-mail, Internet (sales promotion)

Sector:

Leisure

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A12-194462

Ad

An e-mail and website offer, seen on www.kgbdeals.co.uk, stated "£21 for a remote controlled Vibrating Egg (merchant's normal selling price is £48), from Lovers Products - save up to 56% and choose from five colours!".

Issue

The complainant, who said she had found the product on the Lovers Products website for £40.96, challenged whether the claim that the merchant's normal selling price was £48 was misleading.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

kgb (UK) Ltd (kgb) said, while they had set out to provide an attractive offer and had acted in good faith, evidence of the merchant's normal selling price had not been secured and they were therefore unable to substantiate the claim that the merchant's normal selling price was £48. They also said they had identified some important lessons which included addressing the complexity in Euro priced items that were subject to currency fluctuations, taking reasonable steps to secure product delivery by the merchants, and meeting the requirements for fully documented price references for the relevant promotional period. They said they would also ensure that specific information was given to prospective customers about products, pricing and discounts and other relevant terms to ensure that a fair and considered purchase could be made.

Assessment

Upheld

We noted kgb's acknowledgment that they did not hold evidence to demonstrate the merchant's normal selling price. Because we had not received any evidence to demonstrate that the merchant normally sold the product for £48, the claim had not been substantiated. We therefore concluded that it was misleading.

The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation), 3.17 (Prices) and 3.40 (Price comparisons).

Action

The ad must not appear again in its current form. We told kgb to ensure that price comparisons were accurate and that they held evidence to substantiate them in future.

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
 

How to comply with the rules

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website.

Make a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

Press Zone

This section is for journalists only. Here you will be able to access embargoed material, breaking news and briefing papers as well as profile details for the ASA press office.