Advertising Standards Authority
The Top Navigation and Site Search section:
A
A
A
A
Home
Accessibility
Cymraeg
Site Map
Contact Us
Search our web site
Search
Banner Feature:
Skip Navigation Links
Main Navigation
About ASA
News and events
Adjudications
Old Broadcast Rulings
Focus On
Advertising Codes
Research
Annual Report
Links
Keep Me Informed
How to Complain
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
Search
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Visit the CAP web site.
ASA Adjudications
Europeans for Medical Progress Trust
PO Box 53839
London
SE27 0TW
Number of complaints:
1
Date:
7 November 2007
Media:
Leaflet
Sector:
Non-commercial
Ad
A leaflet for Europeans for Medical Progress Trust (EMPT) a charity that campaigned for scientific evaluation of the medical value of animal experiments in drug testing included a quote attributed to Mike Hancock, CBE MP that said: "It is astonishing that animal testing has never been scientifically evaluated and the process is long overdue."
Issue
Pro-Test, a pressure group, challenged whether Europeans for Medical Progress Trust had evidence to support the claim.
The CAP Code
:
3.1
;
3.2
;
7.1
;
8.1
Response
EMPT said the UK Government's position on animal testing was that it had not commissioned or evaluated any formal research on the efficacy of animal experiments and had no plans to do so. They said the quote attributed to Mike Hancock reflected that. EMPT said they were aware that Pro-Test had cited three studies that they believed demonstrated that animal testing had been scientifically evaluated. EMPT believed, however, that the studies had not evaluated the issues scientifically but had looked instead at matters such as legislation, cost benefits and ethics.
Assessment
Not upheld
The ASA considered EMPT had demonstrated that the quote was attributed to Mike Hancock, CBE MP and that it was sufficiently clear that it was a statement of his opinion. Because we considered the quote was put forward sufficiently clearly as a statement of opinion rather than as a proven fact, we considered readers were unlikely to be misled.
We investigated the ad under CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 3.2 (Division of informed opinion), 7.1 (Truthfulness) and 8.1 (Matters of opinion) but did not find it in breach.
Action
No action necessary.
Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)
back
|
top