Advertising Standards Authority
The Top Navigation and Site Search section:
A
A
A
A
Home
Accessibility
Cymraeg
Site Map
Contact Us
Search our web site
Search
Banner Feature:
Skip Navigation Links
Main Navigation
About ASA
News and events
Adjudications
Old Broadcast Rulings
Focus On
Advertising Codes
Research
Annual Report
Links
Keep Me Informed
How to Complain
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
Search
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Visit the CAP web site.
ASA Adjudications
Be Un limited
Be House
62 Lancaster House Mews
London
W2 3QG
Number of complaints:
1
Date:
30 January 2008
Media:
Internet (website content), Internet (display)
Sector:
Computers and telecommunications
Ad
A banner ad on a social networking website for the broadband service Be Un limited (Be)stated "Up to 24Mb/s for £14".
Issue
The complainant challenged that this ad was misleading because when he pursued the offer on Be's website he found that it was not available.
The CAP Code
:
7.1
;
15.1
Response
Be Un limited (Be) said they offered download speeds of up to 24 Mb depending upon what a user's home phone line could support. They said the product "Be Lite", which offered up to 24 Mb broadband for £14 a month with a capped usage was replaced at the end of August with a new product "Be Value" which offered 8 Mb broadband for £14 a month with unlimited usage. They said they understood from the advertising network running their ads on the social networking site that all their banners advertising the old product were taken down by 6 September and new banners issued and developed between 11 and 13 September. They said they were sorry that a consumer had seen an ad for a product which was no longer available. They also said they would follow up the issue with the media buying agency responsible for managing their advertising on that serving network.
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA noted the complainant had seen the ad for the discontinued product "Be Lite" on the 22 September, after the date Be said they had expected this ad to be removed online. Because the product had been withdrawn at the end of August, we considered that the ad was misleading. We considered that it was Be's responsibility to ensure that product changes were communicated promptly to online media buying agencies. We welcomed Be's assurance that they would follow this up to ensure that out-of-date ads were not continued online in future.
Action
We told Be to ensure that their online advertising accurately reflected their broadband packages in future.
Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)
back
|
top