Advertising Standards Authority
The Top Navigation and Site Search section:
A
A
A
A
Home
Accessibility
Cymraeg
Site Map
Contact Us
Search our web site
Search
Banner Feature:
Skip Navigation Links
Main Navigation
About ASA
News and events
Adjudications
Old Broadcast Rulings
Focus On
Advertising Codes
Research
Annual Report
Links
Keep Me Informed
How to Complain
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
Search
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Visit the CAP web site.
ASA Adjudications
News Group Newspapers Ltd t/a The Sun
1 Virginia Street
London
E98 1GG
Number of complaints:
1
Date:
26 November 2008
Media:
Transport
Sector:
Publishing
Ad
An ad in paid for space on a lorry for The Sun newspaper, stated "Where the bloody hell were you?" against a background of the Union Jack flag. It showed Great Britain's (2008) Olympic gold medal tally of 19 compared to Australia's 14.
Issue
The complainant, who saw the lorry parked on a bridge on the M4, objected that the language used was offensive in a public place where it could be seen by children.
The CAP Code
:
2.2
;
47.1
Response
News Group Newspapers Ltd trading as The Sun (The Sun) said they did not consider the slogan "Where the bloody hell were you?" to be offensive, and that it therefore did not need to be restricted from children's viewing. They said the slogan was a reference to a very well known Australian tourist ad. They said the ad was a tongue-in-cheek reference to that ad, and the fact that Great Britain had won more gold medals than Australia in the recent Olympics. They said they considered the word "bloody" to be a generally acceptable mild epithet, and not offensive. They believed their ad as a whole would be understood to be light hearted, tongue in cheek and gently ribbing of Australia's well known sporting success.
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA noted The Sun's ad was a reference to an earlier Australian Tourist Board ad, but also noted complaints about that ad's use of the word "bloody" in outdoor advertising had previously been upheld by the ASA.
We acknowledged that The Sun's ad had been prepared in a light-hearted and tongue-in-cheek manner, following the UK's recent success at the Olympics, but nevertheless considered that the word "bloody" was a swear word, albeit a milder one than some others and concluded that it was socially irresponsible to reproduce it in advertising in an untargeted medium to which children could be exposed.
The ad breached CAP Code clauses 2.2 (Social responsibility) and 47.1 (Children).
Action
We told The Sun not to use the word "bloody" on posters in future.
Adjudication of the ASA Council (Non-broadcast)
back
|
top