ASA Ruling on Sumner Mirrors and Glass Ltd
Sumner Mirrors and Glass Ltd t/a
Mirrorfit
38 Jaggard Way
London
SW12 8SG
Date:
6 March 2013
Media:
Poster
Sector:
Household
Number of complaints:
4
Complaint Ref:
A12-217249
Background
Summary of Council decision:
Two issues were investigated, both were Upheld.
Ad
A poster, for a mirror retailer, was headed "www.mirrorfit.co.uk". On the left was an image of an overweight man's naked body, visible from shoulder to thigh, with his hands covering his genitals. Text underneath the image stated "Need a small mirror? www.mirrorfit.co.uk". On the right was an image of a woman, shown from shoulder to waist, wearing a bra and pushing her breasts together. Text above the image stated "Need a big mirror? www.mirrorfit.co.uk".
Issue
The ASA received four complaints.
1. Three complainants objected that the ad was offensive and unsuitable for display in a public place.
2. One complainant challenged whether the ad was unsuitable to be displayed where it could be seen by children.
CAP Code (Edition 12)
Response
1. & 2.
Mirrorfit said their ad was intended to be eye-catching and that they had shown it to a number of people before finalising the design, none of whom had provided any negative feedback. They told us they did not consider that the advert was inappropriate for display where it could be seen by children.
Assessment
1. & 2. Upheld
The ASA noted that the ad did not feature any explicit nudity. However, we considered that the text "Need a small mirror?" under the image of the male figure and "Need a big mirror?" above the female figure, invited consumers to consider the physical attributes of the models, whose heads were not shown in the images. We further considered that that text was likely to be understood by consumers as innuendo relating to the size of the male figure's genitalia and the female figure's breasts, and that the ad therefore objectified both men and women. We concluded that the ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and that it was irresponsible because it was not suitable to be displayed where it could be seen by children.
The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 1.3 (Social responsibility) and 4.1 (Harm and offence).
Action
The ad must not appear again in its current form.
