ASA Ruling on Anastasia International Inc
Anastasia International Inc t/a
www.russianbrides.com
40 High St Suite #1
Bangor
Maine
USA
Date:
2 July 2014
Media:
Internet (OM 3rd party)
Sector:
Business
Number of complaints:
1
Complaint Ref:
A14-267865
Ad
An ad seen on the TV listings website www.radiotimes.com for the Russian Bride website, www.russianbrides.com. The ad featured a woman, visible from the chest up, wearing a low-cut bra, looking up at the camera with pouted lips. Text alongside the image stated "Sexy Russian Sensations … FLIRT NOW!"
Issue
The complainant challenged whether:
1. the ad was offensive, because it was overtly sexual; and
2. the ad was irresponsible, because it was inappropriately placed on a website that might be seen by children.
CAP Code (Edition 12)
Response
1. & 2. Anastasia International Inc t/a www.russianbrides.com (Anastasia International) did not response to the ASA's enquiries.
Immediate Media Company London Ltd, the publisher of Radio Times, said that the ad was served directly onto their website by their network trading partner. They said that while they did not have any direct control over the ads that were served onto their website, they had comprehensive block lists in place, which included specific categories and advertisers that were not accepted. However, in this instance, despite an automatic block on ads of an adult, provocative or suggestive nature, the ad was served onto their website. They said that after the ad appeared they received three complaints and they restricted the advertiser and contacted their trading partner to ensure the ad would not appear again. They said they had also placed an additional block on 'dating' ads to ensure another layer of protection was in place.
Assessment
1. & 2. Upheld
The ASA was concerned by Anastasia International's lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 1.7 (Unreasonable delay). We reminded them of their responsibility to provide a substantive response to our enquiries and told them to do so in future.
We welcomed the publisher's assurance that additional checks had been put in place to ensure this and similar ads would not appear again on their website.
We noted that the ad featured a woman in a provocative pose that focused on her cleavage, and her pursed lips appeared seductive in nature. We considered the text alongside the image heightened the overtly sexual nature of the ad. We also noted that the ad appeared on a general TV listings website. We therefore considered that the placement of the ad was inappropriate.
Because the ad was overtly sexual and appeared on untargeted medium, which could also be seen by children, we concluded that it was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence.
The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 1.3 (Responsible advertising) and 4.1 (Harm and offence).
Action
The ad must not appear again in its current form in untargeted media. We referred the matter to CAP's Compliance team.