Rulings (111)
  • Huel Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site), App (paid ad)
    • 30 September 2026

    An Instagram video and pre-roll ad on YouTube for Huel was irresponsible by encouraging the exclusive consumption of Huel in place of conventional food. The ads also made unathorised specific health claims.

  • ESTHETURK Danismanlik A.S. t/a You Clinic

    • Search (paid), Social media (paid ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad and a paid-for Google ad for a medical clinic made misleading claims that stem cell treatment could treat or alleviate the traits associated with autism or stop the progression of autism. 

  • Harnbury Holdings Ltd t/a San Carlo

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    An Instagram post by Pamela Olender for the restaurant San Carlo Cicchetti wasn’t obviously identifiable as an ad and broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product. 

  • International Medical Center LLC t/a Swiss Medica

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad for a medical clinic made misleading claims that stem cell treatment could treat or alleviate the traits associated with autism. 

  • Linden Clinics t/a Linden Stem Cell

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a stem cell therapy clinic made misleading claims that stem cell therapy was effective in improving the traits associated with autism in children. 

  • Morley's (Fast Foods) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    An Instagram post by Ellie Scotney for Morley’s UK broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product. 

  • Rumi Pulse t/a Rumi Pulse Medical Tourism Agency

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad for a medical clinic made misleading claims that stem cell treatment could treat or alleviate the traits associated with autism. 

  • The Trade Desk, Inc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    A promoted LinkedIn post from a media buying platform broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food. 

  • Whitworths Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 23 September 2026

    An Instagram post on the WhitworthsUK page made unauthorised health claims and implied that a food could prevent or treat human disease. 

  • Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 September 2026

    A paid-for TikTok ad for Midnite featured someone who was or seemed to be under 25 gambling and playing a significant role in the ad.

  • McCain Foods (GB) Ltd t/a McCain Foodservice Solutions

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 September 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for McCain Foods and Five Akhi’s restaurants broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • White Hat Gaming Ltd t/a Casimba and The Grand Ivy Casino

    • Not upheld
    • Internet (display)
    • 16 September 2026

    Two web display ads for gambling sites and a website weren’t directed at under-18s. 

  • Smart Gravity Ltd t/a top10onlinecasinoreviews.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 09 September 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a gambling comparison website was not targeted responsibly.

  • Kind Patches Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a supplement company, misleadingly implied their products had health benefits without supporting evidence and irresponsibly trivialised and condoned an act of anti-social behaviour. 

  • PLK Chicken UK Ltd t/a Popeyes

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    An Instagram ad by @onlyscrans and a paid-for Instagram ad for Popeyes didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.  

  • Ferrero UK Ltd t/a Thorntons

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 19 August 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Thorntons didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • The Boots Company PLC t/a Boots

    • Upheld
    • National newspaper (paid ad)
    • 19 August 2026

    A national press ad for Boots featured a promotion that wasn’t administered fairly and caused participants unnecessary disappointment.

  • Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite

    • Upheld
    • 12 August 2026

    Two TV ads, Two Video on Demand ads and a radio ad for Midnite, a betting app, portrayed gambling behaviour that could lead to financial, social or emotional harm and also suggested that gambling was an escape from personal problems.

  • EverAI Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 12 August 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for an AI companion app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by including a harmful gender stereotype which objectified women.

  • Gary Baron

    • Upheld
    • 12 August 2026

    A webpage for Gary Baron Counselling claimed that he was a member of the British Association of Counsellors and Psycotherapists when this wasn’t the case.