Rulings (70)
  • Glow Up LLC t/a Maxxing

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    Two paid-for Meta ads for an AI powered app to maximise physical attractiveness misleadingly exaggerated the effectiveness of the product, were irresponsible and included gender stereotypes that were likely to cause harm. 

  • PLK Chicken UK Ltd t/a Popeyes

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    An Instagram ad by @onlyscrans and a paid-for Instagram ad for Popeyes didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.  

  • SheMed Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    A paid-for Reddit ad for a female-focused medical weight-loss service promoted weight-loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules, was likely to exploit consumers’ insecurities relating to body image and weight and was irresponsible.

  • The Monty Bojangles Co Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Monty Bojangles didn’t break the less healthy food rules because it was a small and medium-sized enterprise and was therefore exempt.   

  • BioIdentical Hormone Therapy Ltd t/a BioID Health

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 26 August 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for a hormone health consultant made misleading claims that they could provide more effective tests and services for low testosterone than GPs and were irresponsible by implying that GPs were insufficiently thorough.

  • Stacey’s World Rocks

    • Upheld
    • Messaging app
    • 26 August 2026

    A Telegram post on the Stacey’s World Rocks account was socially irresponsible by encouraging people not to pay household bills.

  • Ferrero UK Ltd t/a Thorntons

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 19 August 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Thorntons didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite

    • Upheld
    • Television, VOD, Radio
    • 12 August 2026

    Two TV ads, Two Video on Demand ads and a radio ad for Midnite, a betting app, portrayed gambling behaviour that could lead to financial, social or emotional harm and also suggested that gambling was an escape from personal problems.

  • Warner Bros Entertainment UK Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Poster, Television
    • 05 August 2026

    A TV ad and two posters for the film They Will Kill You weren’t irresponsible or offensive and didn’t glamourise violence and knife crime. The ads were suitable for display in an untargeted medium, had suitable scheduling restrictions and hasn’t been inappropriately placed during a UEFA Champions Leag...

  • Warner Bros Entertainment UK Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • Poster, Television
    • 05 August 2026

    Posters for the film Lee Cronin’s The Mummy were likely to cause fear or distress to young children and were unsuitable for outdoor display. Two other ads were investigated but they didn’t break our rules.

  • BoyleSports (Gibraltar) Ltd t/a BoyleSports

    • Upheld
    • 29 July 2026

    A paid-for online display ad for a gambling company encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and could lead to financial harm by encouraging frequent and repetitive participation.  

  • Bubbleology UK-I Ltd t/a Bubbleology

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 22 July 2026

     A paid-for Instagram ad for a bubble tea company didn’t break the less healthy food rules because it was a small and medium-sized enterprise and was therefore exempt. 

  • Dignity Funerals Ltd t/a Simplicity Cremations

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 22 July 2026

    Two TV ads for a funeral provider didn’t make clear that the funeral plans advertised were for non-attended cremations only.   

  • Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland Ltd t/a Domino's

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Television, Video on demand
    • 22 July 2026

    A TV ad, Video on Demand ad and a YouTube ad for Domino’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product. 

  • McDonald's Restaurants Ltd t/a McDonald's

    • Not Upheld
    • Television
    • 22 July 2026

    A TV ad for McDonalds didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.   

  • EE Ltd t/a EE

    • Part upheld
    • Poster (digital static image)
    • 15 July 2026

    A digital poster for EE didn’t make sure their comparative claims were verifiable. Another issue was also investigated but it didn’t break our rules.   

  • Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland Ltd t/a Domino's

    • Not Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 July 2026

    Two paid-for social media ads for Domino’s pizza didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.

  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Television, Video on demand
    • 08 July 2026

    A TV ad, Video on Demand and three paid-for social media ads for KFC didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.

  • Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd t/a Mars

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 July 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for M&M’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product through the inclusion of a character that depicted a specific less healthy food product.

  • Papa John's (GB) Ltd t/a Papa Johns

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 July 2026

    A paid for Facebook ad for Papa John’s didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.