Rulings (5)
  • 111 Skin Ltd t/a 111skin

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 13 May 2026

    A product listing for a skincare product misleadingly exaggerated the effects of a cosmetic product for ageing skin.

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board t/a AHDB

    • Upheld in Part
    • Television
    • 13 May 2026

    Two national press ads made claims about the carbon footprints of beef and milk that weren’t supported with full life cycle evidence. Two other issues were investigated in relation to TV ads, an Instagram post, and a website page but they didn’t break the rules.

  • Course Accreditation Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 13 May 2026

    A website and a paid-for Google search ad for an accreditation company didn’t provide suitable evidence to back up objective claims, including comparative claims. The ads also misleadingly implied their accreditation was recognised by insurers and that t...

  • Linjer Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 13 May 2026

    Two paid-for Google ads for a jewellery retailer didn’t make clear that their diamonds were synthetic. 

  • Novita Diamonds Ltd t/a Novita Diamonds

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 13 May 2026

    Two paid-for Meta ads for a jewellery retailer didn’t make clear that their diamonds were synthetic. 

Informally resolved (5)
  • Local Locksmith Services Ltd t/a EmergencyLocksmith24

    • 13 May 2026
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Traffic Label Ltd t/a Slot Genius

    • 13 May 2026
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • United T and C Ltd t/a Dormeo UK

    • 13 May 2026
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • W Livingstone Ltd

    • 13 May 2026
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu

    • 13 May 2026
    • Number of complaints: 1