Pricing and charges

Helpful information on the advertising rules for the pricing of products and services and additional charges, not including legally required costs such as taxes or VAT.

Our rules state that price statements must relate to the product featured in the ad and not a variation of the make or model, and should not mislead by omission, undue emphasis or distortion. We also advise advertisers to refer to the BIS Pricing Practices Guide when preparing their ads.

Another area of complaint we often see is the recommended retail price (RRP) of a product or service. Ordinarily, even if advertisers can provide documentary evidence that the quoted RRP in the ad was recommended by the manufacturer of the product this might not be enough, and any complaints received may get upheld. We require advertisers to be able to demonstrate the product has actually been sold at the advertised price. If an advertiser is the only seller of a product, and so has set the price themselves, it is unlikely to be acceptable to refer to the price as an RRP.

The advertising rules for the pricing of products also state that advertisers shouldn’t use “from” and “up to” claims to exaggerate the availability of a product at a given price. We apply a rule of thumb that 10% of products or services advertised should be available at the “from” or “up to” price stated in the ad, and we have upheld complaints about companies who were unable to sufficiently prove this.

We have also upheld complaints about ads that don’t make additional charges prominent and clear, such as the price of delivery or processing. If a consumer is able to collect the product themselves, delivery charges are not required in the headline price. Any statements that imply delivery is free including those that say “free delivery on orders over £50” or similar, should be avoided if this offer is not attainable for everyone, i.e. additional charges apply to certain postcodes.

+ Read more - Show less

Latest rulings

In The Style Fashion Ltd t/a In the Style
- Upheld
- Website (own site), Social media (own site)
- 23 March 2022
Two Instagram Stories and a website ad for an online clothing brand were banned for making misleading price claims.
Emma Matratzen GmbH t/a Emma Mattress
- Upheld
- Poster, Internet (website content)
- 16 March 2022
A website and poster ad for mattresses were banned for making misleading savings claims.
Specsavers Hearcare Ltd
- Not upheld
- Leaflet
- 16 February 2022
A leaflet for Specsavers Hearcare was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence and was not irresponsible.
Kiddies Kingdom Ltd
- Upheld
- Internet (website content)
- 13 October 2021
A website ad for children’s clothes and products were banned for making misleading savings claims.

View all rulings

Pricing and charges

Helpful information on the advertising rules for the pricing of products and services and additional charges, not including legally required costs such as taxes or VAT.

Latest news

Come on Down! Making Sure the Price is Right with your Price Comparison Advertising

Wait a minute, Mr Postman – Delivery charges in ads

Thinking outside the (subscription) box

An insight into our 2021 Insight articles

TGIBF! Avoid your ads taking a turn for the worst this Black Friday

Keep your “free” claims problem-free

Latest rulings

In The Style Fashion Ltd t/a In the Style

Emma Matratzen GmbH t/a Emma Mattress

Specsavers Hearcare Ltd

Kiddies Kingdom Ltd

Help getting it right

Popular advice

Prices: Recommended retail prices (RRPs)

Promotional marketing: Free entry routes

Ticket pricing

Relevant codes