Pricing and charges

Helpful information on the advertising rules for the pricing of products and services and additional charges, not including legally required costs such as taxes or VAT.

Our rules state that price statements must relate to the product featured in the ad and not a variation of the make or model, and should not mislead by omission, undue emphasis or distortion. We also advise advertisers to refer to the BIS Pricing Practices Guide when preparing their ads.

Another area of complaint we often see is the recommended retail price (RRP) of a product or service. Ordinarily, even if advertisers can provide documentary evidence that the quoted RRP in the ad was recommended by the manufacturer of the product this might not be enough, and any complaints received may get upheld. We require advertisers to be able to demonstrate the product has actually been sold at the advertised price. If an advertiser is the only seller of a product, and so has set the price themselves, it is unlikely to be acceptable to refer to the price as an RRP.

The advertising rules for the pricing of products also state that advertisers shouldn’t use “from” and “up to” claims to exaggerate the availability of a product at a given price. We apply a rule of thumb that 10% of products or services advertised should be available at the “from” or “up to” price stated in the ad, and we have upheld complaints about companies who were unable to sufficiently prove this.

We have also upheld complaints about ads that don’t make additional charges prominent and clear, such as the price of delivery or processing. If a consumer is able to collect the product themselves, delivery charges are not required in the headline price. Any statements that imply delivery is free including those that say “free delivery on orders over £50” or similar, should be avoided if this offer is not attainable for everyone, i.e. additional charges apply to certain postcodes.

+ Read more - Show less

Latest rulings

Anglian Windows Ltd t/a Anglian Home Improvements
- Upheld
- Internet (on own site)
- 05 August 2020
A website ad for home appliances was banned for making misleading savings claims.
BOXT Ltd
- Upheld in part
- Television, Social media (own site)
- 15 July 2020
A YouTube and TV ad for a BOXT boiler was banned for making misleading price comparison claims.
Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2
- Upheld
- National press
- 08 July 2020
Two newspaper ads for O2 made misleading claims about the total cost of an iPad and Surface Pros.
Grapevine Europe Ltd
- Upheld
- Television
- 20 May 2020
A TV ad for a car buying comparison site misled consumers about what personal information was needed to obtain valuations from their website.

View all rulings

Pricing and charges

Helpful information on the advertising rules for the pricing of products and services and additional charges, not including legally required costs such as taxes or VAT.

Latest news

At the right price: making price comparisons with previous prices

Back to School campaigns – Advice for marketers

Don’t miss out on this ‘Daily Deal’ Insight!

To include or not to include? - VAT in stated prices

How free is that free trial?

Thinking outside the (subscription) box

Latest rulings

Anglian Windows Ltd t/a Anglian Home Improvements

BOXT Ltd

Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2

Grapevine Europe Ltd

Help getting it right

Popular advice

Prices: Recommended retail prices (RRPs)

Promotional marketing: Free entry routes

Compulsory costs and charges: Delivery charges

Relevant codes