Latest rulings

  • King.com Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • App (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for a mobile game misleadingly suggested that the content shown was representative of actual gameplay.

  • Omnilojo Pte Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid), App (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    Three paid-for Google ads for a mobile game misleadingly suggested that the content shown was representative of actual gameplay. The ads also implied that the game had won awards when this wasn’t the case.

  • Scopely Inc

    • Upheld in part
    • App (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for a mobile game misleadingly suggested that the content shown was representative of actual gameplay.

  • Vistrex Ltd t/a Royal Ark

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid), App (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad and an app store listing for a mobile game misleadingly suggested that the content shown was representative of actual gameplay.