Computers, phones and telecoms

Helpful information on the advertising rules for ads that reference, or include products/services relating to computers, phones and telecoms.

There are plenty of options for consumers when it comes to telecom services. In general, any ads that feature digital services or products, including computers, printers, phones or sat-nav’s, must not mislead consumers and advertisers should always hold evidence to back up any claims made about the performance of the product. All descriptions of the product should also be accurate e.g. size and dimensions.

Naturally advertisers will want to showcase why their telecoms package is the best; whether that’s because it is the cheapest on the market, or the fastest. As an example, broadband providers are often prolific advertisers who promote a variety of different packages for their broadband, line rental or TV channels. We have conducted extensive customer research to understand how consumers view these deals and whether they understand what the product will provide based on the ad. This research has influenced the advertising rules we enforce.

It’s important that advertisers show an all-inclusive monthly cost in their ads and don’t separate out the price of certain compulsory services, such as line rental when consumers sign-up for a broadband package. They also must give prominence to the contract length, any post-discount pricing, and any up-front costs such as delivery fees, installation fees etc. Up-front costs should also be combined in to one all-inclusive fee.

“Unlimited” claims are only permitted if the user incurs no additional charge or suspension of service as a consequence of exceeding any usage threshold. Any limitations imposed by the telecoms provider must be moderate and clearly explained in the ad.

Any speed claims should be based on the actual experience of users and advertisers need to be able to demonstrate on request that the speeds they advertise can be achieved by at least 10% of their customers. Any factors that are likely to cause customers to receive speeds significantly below those claimed in the ad, should be prominent and clearly stated.

+ Read more - Show less

Latest rulings

CityFibre Holdings Ltd
- Not upheld
- Direct mail
- 23 April 2025
A direct mailing wasn't misleading.
Vodafone Ltd
- Upheld in part
- Website (own site)
- 16 April 2025
Claims on Vodafone’s website which contained references to reliability and coverage failed to objectively compare one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative features.
Hutchison 3G UK Ltd t/a Three Mobile
- Not upheld
- National newspaper (paid ad), Social media (paid ad), Internet (website content)
- 02 April 2025
A national press ad, two paid-for Meta ads and a website for Three Mobile didn’t make misleading ‘best value’ claims.
EE Ltd t/a EE
- Upheld
- Social media (paid ad), Television, Radio
- 26 March 2025
A TV, radio, paid-for social media and digital poster ad for EE made unsubstantiated claims about the performance and capabilities of a Wi-Fi router.

View all rulings

Computers, phones and telecoms

Helpful information on the advertising rules for ads that reference, or include products/services relating to computers, phones and telecoms.

Latest news

Mid-contract price increases in telecoms contracts

Don’t hate the player, hate the game(play) - misleading gameplay in videogame ads

Take your social responsibilities seriously!

The need for speed: Navigating speed claims in broadband & telecoms ads

Evidently, evidence is everything! Six tips on sound substantiation

Top tips for responsible influencer marketing

Latest rulings

CityFibre Holdings Ltd

Vodafone Ltd

Hutchison 3G UK Ltd t/a Three Mobile

EE Ltd t/a EE

Help getting it right

Popular advice

Regulatory statement - Mid-contract price rises in telecoms ads

Broadband and Telecoms: Pricing and Charges

Guidance on Broadband speed claims

Relevant codes

10 Use of data for marketing